Federal contractor · VICTORVILLE, CA

VICTOR VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT

VICTOR VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT received $33.9K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−37% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.2M. Its largest customer was Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons ($33.9K). It also received $38.2M in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$33.9K
New awards
1
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
PHH3G6DABW43
Parent company
SAN MATEO COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT
Other than small businessEducational institutionGovernment entity

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the SAN DIEGO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT company family: 5 registered entities, $38.1K in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. SAN DIEGO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICTSAN DIEGO, CA · Family page
    $0
  2. $4,177
  3. $0
  4. $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 411.5KFY2017
  2. 214.5KFY2018
  3. 202.9KFY2019
  4. -20.3KFY2020
  5. 101.5KFY2021
  6. 50.4KFY2022
  7. 219.4KFY2023
  8. -21.6KFY2024
  9. 54KFY2025
  10. 33.9KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Education & social services$33.9K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons· San Bernardino County, CA· Education & social services· Apr 29, 2026 – Apr 29, 2026· 15B61626F00000083

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

VICTOR VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT received $38.2M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 229 actions (5 new awards), −9.4% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program ($36.2M).

Assistance · FY2026
$38.2M
New awards
5
Actions
229
Since FY2021
$199.4M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 51.3MFY2021
  2. 9.4MFY2022
  3. 24.9MFY2023
  4. 33.5MFY2024
  5. 42.1MFY2025
  6. 38.2MFY2026

By type

  1. Direct payments$38.2M100%
  2. Grants-$58.3K0.0%

Top programs

  1. 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program$36.2M95%
  2. 84.033 · Federal Work-Study Program$1M2.6%
  3. 84.007 · Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants$1M2.6%
  4. 84.425 · Education Stabilization Fund-$2,3270.0%
  5. 84.047 · Trio Upward Bound-$56K0.0%

Awarding agencies

Largest awards

  1. 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program· Department of Education· Direct payment for specified use· Aug 29, 2024 – Sep 18, 2026· P063P240058
  2. 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program· Department of Education· Direct payment for specified use· Sep 16, 2025 – Sep 18, 2026· P063P250058
  3. 84.425 · Education Stabilization Fund· Department of Education· Formula grant· Feb 17, 2021 – Apr 27, 2026· P425E201275
  4. 84.047 · Trio Upward Bound· Department of Education· Project grant· Jul 8, 2021 – Dec 2, 2025· P047A170044
  5. 84.007 · Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants· Department of Education· Direct payment for specified use· Apr 1, 2026 – Apr 1, 2026· P007A260666
  6. 84.033 · Federal Work-Study Program· Department of Education· Direct payment for specified use· Apr 1, 2026 – Apr 1, 2026· P033A260666

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $82.2K (3 subawards)

2 primes

  1. DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES CALIFORNIA$43.6K53%
    SACRAMENTO, CA · 2 subawards
  2. SACRAMENTO, CA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $222K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $50K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $82.2K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

5 companies · $11.6M reported

  1. SACRAMENTO, CA · 32 subawards
  2. MATHER, CA · 2 subawards
  3. RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC · 1 subaward

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SAN DIEGO, CA · 83% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Vocational rehabilitation servicesU.S. Special Operations Command · Technical and trade schools
  2. EINHORN BARBARA O$316.4K−41% in FY2026
    PHILADELPHIA, PA · 61% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Vocational rehabilitation services
  3. PARA TUNNEL TECHNOLOGIE GMBH$96.7K−100% in FY2026
    NEUFAHRN B. FREISING, DEU · 23% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Special Operations Command · Technical and trade schools

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of SAN DIEGO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT (5 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • San Diego Community College DistrictAI match · 97%
Lobbying · 2025
$80K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$280K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$80K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$80K
    4 reports
  3. 2025$80K
    4 reports
  4. 2026$40K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Education14 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES14 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE14 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Downs Government Affairs$280K
    14 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.