Federal contractor · HUNTSVILLE, AL

VISION TECHNOLOGY INC

VISION TECHNOLOGY INC received $2.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (−37% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $23.2M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($2.2M).

Obligations · FY2026
$2.2M
New awards
5
Sole-source
61%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
Z4U7KBDMXLQ3
Parent company
VISION TECHNOLOGY INC
Small businessMinority-owned8(a) programHUBZone firm

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.4MFY2017
  2. 1.4MFY2018
  3. 1.4MFY2019
  4. 2MFY2020
  5. 1.5MFY2021
  6. 2.9MFY2022
  7. 3.6MFY2023
  8. 3.4MFY2024
  9. 3.4MFY2025
  10. 2.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 5 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Health & medical$1.9M89%
  2. Equipment maintenance$246.5K11%

Where the work was performed

  1. Bell County, TX$246.5K11%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition61%
    US 39% · $1.3M
  • Sole-source awards61%
    US 30% · $1.3M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Orange County, NY· Health & medical· Aug 27, 2020 – Jun 10, 2026· W91YTZ20C0014
  2. Department of the Army· Bexar County, TX· Health & medical· Sep 5, 2024 – Feb 12, 2026· W81K0024P0203
  3. Department of the Army· Leavenworth County, KS· Health & medical· Jul 21, 2022 – Feb 10, 2026· W81K0022P0173
  4. Department of the Army· Bell County, TX· Equipment maintenance· Aug 14, 2025 – Mar 18, 2026· W81K0025PA153
  5. Department of the Army· Bexar County, TX· Health & medical· Aug 29, 2024 – Jan 29, 2026· W81K0024P0198

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $9.6M (6 subawards)

1 prime

  1. SPRINGFIELD, VA · 6 subawards

By fiscal year

  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $83.6K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $91.2K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $14.3M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $9.6M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $24M reported

  1. SPRINGFIELD, VA · 13 subawards · Office administrative services
  2. SPRINGFIELD, VA · 1 subaward · Offices of other health practitioners
  3. MCLEAN, VA · 6 subawards · Educational support services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ROCKVILLE, MD · 56% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Offices of physicians
  2. RIELCAD JV LLC$10M−6.2% in FY2026
    ATLANTA, GA · 57% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Offices of physicians
  3. HERNDON, VA · 36% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · General medical and surgical hospitals

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.