Federal contractor · WAGNER, SD

VON ESCHEN JASON N

VON ESCHEN JASON N received $25.1K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards. Since FY2017: $1.5M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($25.1K).

Obligations · FY2026
$25.1K
New awards
4
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
CN3ZKRV4VS15
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 189.6KFY2017
  2. 270.1KFY2018
  3. 249.1KFY2019
  4. 202.7KFY2020
  5. 162.7KFY2021
  6. 200.5KFY2022
  7. 98.6KFY2023
  8. 197.8KFY2024
  9. -65.2KFY2025
  10. 25.1KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$25.1K100%
    4 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$25.1K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Cedar County, NE$32.5K100%
  2. Charles Mix County, SD$17.8K71%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · -$25.2K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · -$25.2K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. VEGETATIVE SPRAYING SERVICES - 60610$78.2K
    Department of the Army· Knox County, NE· Facilities & utilities· Apr 5, 2021 – Dec 17, 2025· W9128F21P0020
  2. BASE YEAR - JOINT FUNDING$41K
    Department of the Army· Cedar County, NE· Facilities & utilities· Apr 29, 2022 – Jan 30, 2026· W9128F22P0039
  3. GAVINS POINT PROJECT VEGETATIVE SPRAYING CONTRACT 2026-2031$26.3K
    Department of the Army· Cedar County, NE· Facilities & utilities· Apr 17, 2026 – Apr 17, 2026· W9128F26PA044
  4. FORT RANDALL PESTICIDE APPLICATION SERVICES - TASK ORDER 5$17.8K
    Department of the Army· Charles Mix County, SD· Facilities & utilities· Mar 17, 2026 – Mar 17, 2026· W9128F26FA049

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MADISON LAWRENCE INDUSTRIES, INC.$159K0% in FY2026
    UNION, NJ · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Services to buildings and dwellings
  2. CUNNINGHAMS AIR SYSTEMS CLEANING SPECIALISTS LLC$166K+121% in FY2026
    PEARL CITY, HI · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Services to buildings and dwellings
  3. BERGER'S PROPERTY MAINTENANCE COMPANY$166.6K−100% in FY2026
    PALMETTO BAY, FL · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Services to buildings and dwellings

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.