Federal contractor · KALAMAZOO, MI

WALSH SERVICE SOLUTIONS LLC

WALSH SERVICE SOLUTIONS LLC received $5,000 in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−100% vs FY2025). Since FY2022: $24.5M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($5,000).

Obligations · FY2026
$5,000
New awards
1
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
MLCNYDBEJK23
Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-ownedMinority-ownedHUBZone firmNative-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $1.5M in FY2026 together.

  1. WALSH SERVICE SOLUTIONS LLCKALAMAZOO, MI · Family page
    $5,000
  2. WALSH SERVICE SOLUTIONS, LLCSAULT SAINTE MARIE, MI
    $1.5M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 9.2MFY2022
  2. 2MFY2023
  3. 13.3MFY2025
  4. 5KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$5,000100%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$5,000100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Wayne County, MI$5,000100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $5,000
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.7% · $5,000
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. GREAT LAKES DREDGING MULTIPLE AWARD TASK ORDER CONTRACT (MATOC) MINIMUM GUARANTEE$5,000
    Department of the Army· Wayne County, MI· Construction & real property· Jan 22, 2026 – Jan 22, 2026· W911XK26FA020

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. JOSEPH B. FAY CO.$13.3M−65% in FY2026
    PITTSBURGH, PA · 71% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other heavy and civil engineering construction
  2. BLOOMSDALE EXCAVATING COMPANY, INCORPORATED$13M−100% in FY2026
    BLOOMSDALE, MO · 70% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other heavy and civil engineering construction
  3. ZAK DIRT, INC.$13M−95% in FY2026
    MEAD, CO · 70% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other heavy and civil engineering construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.