Federal contractor · WESTFIR, OR

WARNER CREEK CO

WARNER CREEK CO received $178.9K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (−12% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $3.3M. Its largest customer was Forest Service ($178.9K).

Obligations · FY2026
$178.9K
New awards
6
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
PLTGPFD5KEP8
Small businessWoman-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 194.2KFY2017
  2. 419.5KFY2018
  3. 141.3KFY2019
  4. 761.6KFY2020
  5. 313.3KFY2021
  6. 477.5KFY2022
  7. 384.2KFY2023
  8. 245.5KFY2024
  9. 203.1KFY2025
  10. 178.9KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Forest Service$178.9K100%
    2 awards
  2. 4 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$178.9K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Lane County, OR$178.9K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Bureau of Land Management· Tillamook County, OR· Facilities & utilities· Sep 7, 2023 – Dec 16, 2025· 140L4323F0065
  2. Forest Service· Lane County, OR· Facilities & utilities· Apr 6, 2026 – Apr 6, 2026· 1240BE26P0033
  3. Forest Service· Lane County, OR· Facilities & utilities· Sep 12, 2025 – Nov 6, 2025· 1240BE25P0041
  4. Bureau of Land Management· Lane County, OR· Professional services· Aug 14, 2023 – Dec 5, 2025· 140L4323F0082
  5. Bureau of Land Management· Tillamook County, OR· Facilities & utilities· Aug 28, 2024 – Nov 14, 2025· 140L4324F0098
  6. Bureau of Land Management· Lane County, OR· Facilities & utilities· Aug 6, 2025 – Nov 25, 2025· 140L4325F0097

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MACKEY FIRE & ICE, LLC$655.2K−53% in FY2026
    EAGLE, ID · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Support activities for forestryBureau of Land Management · Support activities for forestry
  2. HALEY, TODD B$690.7K−39% in FY2026
    BEND, OR · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Support activities for forestryBureau of Land Management · Support activities for forestry
  3. MOUNTAIN MAN WOOD PROJECTS$563.9K+14% in FY2026
    TEN SLEEP, WY · 90% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Support activities for forestryBureau of Land Management · Support activities for forestry

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.