Federal contractor · COOS BAY, OR
WEST COAST CONTRACTORS, INC.
WEST COAST CONTRACTORS, INC. received $786.4K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 7 awards (−93% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $37.8M. Its largest customer was Federal Highway Administration ($673.8K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $786.4K
- New awards
- 7
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- E2L8M92EYXL7
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 30.5KFY2017
- 519.1KFY2018
- 949.8KFY2019
- 2.9MFY2020
- 443.5KFY2021
- 2MFY2022
- 3.8MFY2023
- 14.3MFY2024
- 12.1MFY2025
- 786.4KFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Federal Highway Administration$673.8K86%4 awards
- Bureau of Land Management$71.1K9.0%2 awards
- Department of the Air Force$41.4K5.3%1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Construction & real property$789.2K100%
Where the work was performed
- Mariposa County, CA$696K89%
- Tulare County, CA$95.6K12%
- Jackson County, OR$73.9K9.4%
- Grand Forks County, ND$41.4K5.3%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition0.0%US 39% · -$2,800
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.7% · -$2,800
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- CA ERFO NP SEKI 2023-2(2) CRYSTAL CAVE REPAIRS CRYSTAL CAVE PERMANENT ROAD CONSTRUCTION REPAIRS$5.8MFederal Highway Administration· Tulare County, CA· Construction & real property· Jul 1, 2025 – Sep 8, 2026· 6982AF25F00065N
- Federal Highway Administration· Mariposa County, CA· Construction & real property· Aug 4, 2025 – Aug 17, 2026· 6982AF25F00069N
- Department of the Air Force· Grand Forks County, ND· Construction & real property· Sep 9, 2024 – May 22, 2026· FA465924F0043
- Federal Highway Administration· El Dorado County, CA· Construction & real property· Jan 3, 2024 – Oct 16, 2025· 6982AF24F00017N
- Bureau of Land Management· Jackson County, OR· Construction & real property· Sep 16, 2024 – Aug 13, 2026· 140L4324F0117
- Federal Highway Administration· Madera County, CA· Construction & real property· Jul 1, 2025 – Apr 30, 2026· 6982AF25F00064N
- Bureau of Land Management· Douglas County, OR· Facilities & utilities· Aug 26, 2024 – Feb 17, 2026· 140L4324F0088
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
No subawards reported to other companies.
Primes that pay it
1 company · $201.4K reported
- PASCAGOULA, MS · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 7 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- CONWAY CONSTRUCTION CO$14.8M−103% in FY2026VANCOUVER, WA · 55% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Highway Administration · Highway, street, and bridge construction
- SAN JUAN, PR · 55% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Highway Administration · Highway, street, and bridge construction
- MISSOULA, MT · 54% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Highway Administration · Highway, street, and bridge construction
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.