Federal contractor · VEVAY, IN
WESTLAMB, LLC
WESTLAMB, LLC received $401.6K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 13 awards (−26% vs FY2025). Since FY2022: $2M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($324.3K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $401.6K
- New awards
- 13
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- XUAKGLDGH7Z6
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 169.8KFY2022
- 387KFY2023
- 511.7KFY2024
- 543.3KFY2025
- 401.6KFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Army$324.3K81%9 awards
- Department of Veterans Affairs$58.2K15%3 awards
- Forest Service$19K4.7%1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Facilities & utilities$401.6K100%
Where the work was performed
- Adams County, CO$62.5K16%
- Montgomery County, OH$53.2K13%
- Weber County, UT$50.2K13%
- Leavenworth County, KS$49.2K12%
- Jefferson County, CO$41.6K10%
- Salt Lake County, UT$39.3K9.8%
- Johnson County, KS$32.9K8.2%
- Monroe County, IN$31.1K7.7%
- Perry County, IN$19K4.7%
- Hidalgo County, TX$15K3.7%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition0.0%US 39% · $0
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.8% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Department of the Army· Salt Lake County, UT· Facilities & utilities· May 31, 2022 – May 11, 2026· W911SA22P3048
- Department of the Army· Adams County, CO· Facilities & utilities· May 22, 2023 – May 8, 2026· W911SA23P3075
- Department of Veterans Affairs· Leavenworth County, KS· Facilities & utilities· Jul 25, 2023 – Jul 27, 2026· 36C78623C50372
- 0001 CUSTODIAL SERVICES BASE$159.9KDepartment of the Army· Montgomery County, OH· Facilities & utilities· Mar 26, 2024 – Mar 12, 2026· W911SA24P3054
- Department of the Army· Weber County, UT· Facilities & utilities· Dec 29, 2023 – Dec 29, 2025· W911SA24P3018
- Department of the Army· Ada County, ID· Facilities & utilities· Oct 18, 2022 – Apr 30, 2026· W911SA23P3005
- 1001 CUSTODIAL SERVICE OPT 1$123.8KDepartment of the Army· Johnson County, KS· Facilities & utilities· May 25, 2023 – May 6, 2026· W911SA23P3076
- Department of the Army· Jefferson County, CO· Facilities & utilities· Feb 29, 2024 – Feb 18, 2026· W911SA24P3027
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- SEOJIN TNS CO., LTD$1.3M−72% in FY2026SUWON, KOR · 86% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Services to buildings and dwellings
- QB CLEANING LLC$1.3M−75% in FY2026DETROIT, MI · 86% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Services to buildings and dwellings
- COASTAL ENTERPRISES OF JACKSONVILLE, INC.$1.2M−98% in FY2026WILMINGTON, NC · 83% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Services to buildings and dwellings
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.