Federal contractor · VEVAY, IN

WESTLAMB, LLC

WESTLAMB, LLC received $401.6K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 13 awards (−26% vs FY2025). Since FY2022: $2M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($324.3K).

Obligations · FY2026
$401.6K
New awards
13
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
XUAKGLDGH7Z6
Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 169.8KFY2022
  2. 387KFY2023
  3. 511.7KFY2024
  4. 543.3KFY2025
  5. 401.6KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 9 awards
  2. 3 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$401.6K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Salt Lake County, UT· Facilities & utilities· May 31, 2022 – May 11, 2026· W911SA22P3048
  2. Department of the Army· Adams County, CO· Facilities & utilities· May 22, 2023 – May 8, 2026· W911SA23P3075
  3. Department of Veterans Affairs· Leavenworth County, KS· Facilities & utilities· Jul 25, 2023 – Jul 27, 2026· 36C78623C50372
  4. Department of the Army· Montgomery County, OH· Facilities & utilities· Mar 26, 2024 – Mar 12, 2026· W911SA24P3054
  5. Department of the Army· Weber County, UT· Facilities & utilities· Dec 29, 2023 – Dec 29, 2025· W911SA24P3018
  6. Department of the Army· Ada County, ID· Facilities & utilities· Oct 18, 2022 – Apr 30, 2026· W911SA23P3005
  7. Department of the Army· Johnson County, KS· Facilities & utilities· May 25, 2023 – May 6, 2026· W911SA23P3076
  8. Department of the Army· Jefferson County, CO· Facilities & utilities· Feb 29, 2024 – Feb 18, 2026· W911SA24P3027

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SEOJIN TNS CO., LTD$1.3M−72% in FY2026
    SUWON, KOR · 86% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Services to buildings and dwellings
  2. QB CLEANING LLC$1.3M−75% in FY2026
    DETROIT, MI · 86% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Services to buildings and dwellings
  3. WILMINGTON, NC · 83% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Services to buildings and dwellings

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.