Federal contractor · NAMPA, ID

WILDWOOD TREE CARE LLC

WILDWOOD TREE CARE LLC received $180.1K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (+14% vs FY2025). Since FY2024: $407.1K. Its largest customer was Forest Service ($180.1K).

Obligations · FY2026
$180.1K
New awards
4
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
MR7RQ9JUEH51
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 69.5KFY2024
  2. 157.5KFY2025
  3. 180.1KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Forest Service$180.1K100%
    4 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$180.1K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Montrose County, CO$64.6K36%
  2. Carbon County, UT$49K27%
  3. Ada County, ID$45.5K25%
  4. Sevier County, UT$21K12%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $180.1K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.7% · $180.1K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. WILDWOOD TREE CARE LLC COGMF000114 E147$64.6K
    Forest Service· Montrose County, CO· Facilities & utilities· Jul 23, 2026 – Jul 23, 2026· 1202SB26M2282
  2. WILDWOOD TREE CARE LLC UTMLF005112 E200$49K
    Forest Service· Carbon County, UT· Facilities & utilities· Jul 4, 2026 – Jul 4, 2026· 1202SB26M1339
  3. WILDWOOD TREE CARE LLC IDBOF000958 E144$45.5K
    Forest Service· Ada County, ID· Facilities & utilities· Sep 2, 2026 – Sep 2, 2026· 1202SB26M3250
  4. WILDWOOD TREE CARE LLC UTFIF260341 E329$21K
    Forest Service· Sevier County, UT· Facilities & utilities· Aug 14, 2026 – Aug 14, 2026· 1202SB26M2434

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. OAK VALLEY EXCAVATING LLC$421K+7,288% in FY2026
    MORA, NM · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Support activities for forestry
  2. CRAIG D MARTIN$422.1K
    DAYTON, WA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Support activities for forestry
  3. STERLING CREEK TRANSPORT LLC$426.1K+9.8% in FY2026
    JACKSONVILLE, OR · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Support activities for forestry

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.