Federal contractor · HATTIESBURG, MS

WILLIAM CAREY UNIVERSITY

WILLIAM CAREY UNIVERSITY received $148.8K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−17% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.1M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($99.3K). It also received $8.3M in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$148.8K
New awards
2
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
ZS3ZMLQ2HDQ5
Other than small businessNonprofitEducational institution

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 46.5KFY2017
  2. 77.1KFY2018
  3. 100.8KFY2019
  4. 100.5KFY2020
  5. 81.2KFY2021
  6. 71KFY2022
  7. 158.7KFY2023
  8. 145.3KFY2024
  9. 179.9KFY2025
  10. 148.8KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Education & social services$148.8K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $148.8K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $148.8K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards
  2. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Forrest County, MS· Education & social services· Apr 1, 2026 – Apr 1, 2026· N0622A26FA279
  2. Department of the Army· Forrest County, MS· Education & social services· May 27, 2026 – May 27, 2026· W9124D26PA143

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

WILLIAM CAREY UNIVERSITY received $8.3M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 269 actions (6 new awards), −19% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program ($8M).

Assistance · FY2026
$8.3M
New awards
6
Actions
269
Since FY2021
$48.5M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 13.5MFY2021
  2. 2.1MFY2022
  3. 6.4MFY2023
  4. 7.8MFY2024
  5. 10.3MFY2025
  6. 8.3MFY2026

By type

  1. Direct payments$8.5M100%
  2. Grants-$172.9K0.0%

Top programs

  1. 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program$8M96%
  2. 84.033 · Federal Work-Study Program$352.3K4.2%
  3. 84.379 · Teacher Education Assistance for College and Higher Education Grants (Teach GRANTS)$80.4K1.0%
  4. 84.007 · Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants$47.1K0.6%
  5. 84.425 · Education Stabilization Fund-$172.9K0.0%

Awarding agencies

Largest awards

  1. 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program· Department of Education· Direct payment for specified use· Jul 1, 2025 – Sep 7, 2026· P063P251724
  2. 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program· Department of Education· Direct payment for specified use· May 15, 2024 – Jul 6, 2026· P063P241724
  3. 84.425 · Education Stabilization Fund· Department of Education· Formula grant· Jan 17, 2021 – Apr 27, 2026· P425E202673
  4. 84.033 · Federal Work-Study Program· Department of Education· Direct payment for specified use· Apr 1, 2026 – Apr 1, 2026· P033A262278
  5. 84.033 · Federal Work-Study Program· Department of Education· Direct payment for specified use· Mar 29, 2024 – Mar 20, 2026· P033A242278
  6. 93.264 · Nurse Faculty Loan Program (NFLP)· Health Resources and Services Administration· Project grant· May 30, 2024 – Feb 27, 2026· E0153163

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BOSTON, MA · 69% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Colleges, universities, and professional schools
  2. KALAMAZOO, MI · 69% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Colleges, universities, and professional schools
  3. PACIFIC UNIVERSITY$294.8K−48% in FY2026
    FOREST GROVE, OR · 62% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Colleges, universities, and professional schools

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • William Carey UniversityAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$57.5K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2024–2026
$112.5K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2024$55K
    4 reports
  2. 2025$57.5K
    4 reports
  3. 2026$0
    1 reports

Top issues

  1. Education9 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES9 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE9 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Capitol Resources, LLC$112.5K
    9 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.