Federal contractor · DOTHAN, AL

WIREGRASS REHABILITATION CENTER INC

WIREGRASS REHABILITATION CENTER INC received $15.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 16 awards (+36% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $59M. Its largest customer was Department of Veterans Affairs ($14.6M).

Obligations · FY2026
$15.2M
New awards
16
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
RA15VN5CHKW6
Other than small businessNonprofit

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 3.2MFY2017
  2. 2.7MFY2018
  3. 2.6MFY2019
  4. 2.5MFY2020
  5. 2.9MFY2021
  6. 5.5MFY2022
  7. 6.1MFY2023
  8. 7.2MFY2024
  9. 11.1MFY2025
  10. 15.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 13 awards
  2. 2 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$15.2M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Lake County, IL$641.7K4.2%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $15.2M
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $15.2M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs · 7 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs· Houston County, AL· Facilities & utilities· Jan 28, 2026 – Jun 26, 2026· 36C24726C0010
  2. Department of the Navy· Houston County, AL· Facilities & utilities· Jul 28, 2022 – Feb 28, 2026· N6883622P0232
  3. Department of the Navy· Houston County, AL· Facilities & utilities· Sep 27, 2024 – Jan 30, 2026· N0018924P0666
  4. Department of Veterans Affairs· Dale County, AL· Facilities & utilities· Oct 1, 2025 – Oct 1, 2025· 36C24926N0162
  5. Department of Veterans Affairs· Shelby County, TN· Facilities & utilities· Nov 8, 2024 – Apr 8, 2026· 36C24925P0138
  6. Department of Veterans Affairs· Cook County, IL· Facilities & utilities· Mar 3, 2026 – Mar 3, 2026· 36C25226N0316
  7. Department of Veterans Affairs· Milwaukee County, WI· Facilities & utilities· Mar 6, 2025 – Aug 23, 2026· 36C25225N0301
  8. Department of Veterans Affairs· Milwaukee County, WI· Facilities & utilities· Mar 5, 2025 – Apr 28, 2026· 36C25225N0300

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $169K (2 subawards)

1 prime

  1. MONTGOMERY, AL · 2 subawards

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $753.9K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $169K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $923K reported

  1. MONTGOMERY, AL · 6 subawards
  2. MONTGOMERY, AL · 1 subaward

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BATTLE CREEK, MI · 48% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Drycleaning and laundry services
  2. SAN DIEGO, CA · 43% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Drycleaning and laundry servicesDefense Health Agency · Drycleaning and laundry services
  3. CENTURY LINEN & UNIFORM, LLC$10.9M+1.8% in FY2026
    GLOVERSVILLE, NY · 33% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Drycleaning and laundry services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.