Federal contractor · PRINCETON, NJ

WISS, JANNEY, ELSTNER ASSOCIATES, INC.

WISS, JANNEY, ELSTNER ASSOCIATES, INC. received $2,371 in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−98% vs FY2025). Since FY2021: $677.2K. Its largest customer was Smithsonian Institution ($2,371).

Obligations · FY2026
$2,371
New awards
2
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
NTMGFJ2F22D9
Parent company
WISS, JANNEY, ELSTNER ASSOCIATES, INC.
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the WISS JANNEY ELSTNER ASSOCIATES INC company family: 7 registered entities, $1.2M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. WISS JANNEY ELSTNER ASSOCIATES INCEMERYVILLE, CA · Family page
    $99.1K
  2. WISS, JANNEY, ELSTNER ASSOCIATES, INC.NORTHBROOK, IL
    $1.1M
  3. WISS JANNEY ELSTNER ASSOCIATES INCLAKEWOOD, CO
    $0
  4. WISS JANNEY ELSTNER ASSOCIATES INCMINNEAPOLIS, MN
    $0
  5. WISS JANNEY ELSTNER ASSOCIATES INCHONOLULU, HI
    $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 44.9KFY2021
  2. 109.4KFY2022
  3. 366.2KFY2024
  4. 154.3KFY2025
  5. 2.4KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Smithsonian Institution$2,371100%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$2,371100%

Where the work was performed

  1. District of Columbia, DC$2,371100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. NZP-DC: RENEW BIRD HOUSE & GREAT FLIGHT AVIARY.$98.9K
    Smithsonian Institution· District of Columbia, DC· Construction & real property· Feb 24, 2022 – Oct 27, 2025· 33330222FF0010140
  2. HMSG: EVALUATE SCULPTURE VIBRATION$12K
    Smithsonian Institution· District of Columbia, DC· Construction & real property· Aug 13, 2026 – Aug 13, 2026· 33330226FF0010369

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

15 companies · $822.1K reported

  1. WISS, JANNEY, ELSTNER ASSOCIATES, INC.$237.2K
    CLEVELAND, OH · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. GRUMMAN/BUTKUS ASSOCIATES, LTD.$227.1K
    MILWAUKEE, WI · 4 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. SEVEN GENERATIONS ARCHITECTURE & ENGINEERING LLC$138.5K
    KALAMAZOO, MI · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

12 companies · $5.8M reported

  1. HDR ENVIRONMENTAL, OPERATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION, INC.$1.3M
    ENGLEWOOD, CO · 4 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. AMENTUM SERVICES, INC.$1.2M
    CHANTILLY, VA · 6 subawards · Remediation and other waste management services
  3. HELLMUTH, OBATA & KASSABAUM, P.C.$966K
    WASHINGTON, DC · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 8 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ALPHA CONSTRUCTION AND ENGINEERING CORPORATION$6.1M−9.8% in FY2026
    STERLING, VA · 55% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Park Service · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesPublic Buildings Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. HOUSER WALKER ARCHITECTURE, LLC$6.6M−59% in FY2026
    ATLANTA, GA · 52% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Park Service · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesPublic Buildings Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. MILLS AND SCHNOERING ARCHITECTS, PC$5.5M+76% in FY2026
    YARDLEY, PA · 48% of this company's obligations are in markets they both servePublic Buildings Service · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNational Park Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.