Federal contractor · NORFOLK, VA

WITHIN INTERIOR DESIGN, INC.

WITHIN INTERIOR DESIGN, INC. received $19.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (+1,057% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $96.3M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($19.1M).

Obligations · FY2026
$19.1M
New awards
4
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
NFZ6NXT47Y76
Parent company
WITHIN INTERIOR DESIGN, INC
Small businessWoman-ownedMinority-owned8(a) program

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2.6MFY2017
  2. 13.3MFY2018
  3. 8.4MFY2019
  4. 7.4MFY2020
  5. 8.4MFY2021
  6. 19.1MFY2022
  7. 13MFY2023
  8. 3.5MFY2024
  9. 1.7MFY2025
  10. 19.1MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Equipment maintenance$18.5M97%
  2. Construction & real property$587.8K3.1%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Norfolk city, VA· Equipment maintenance· Jan 26, 2026 – Jan 26, 2026· N4008526F0297
  2. Department of the Navy· Portsmouth city, VA· Construction & real property· Aug 31, 2023 – Jun 4, 2026· N4008523F6332
  3. U.S. Coast Guard· Pasquotank County, NC· Construction & real property· Jan 23, 2017 – Oct 10, 2025· HSCG8315CPCR071
  4. U.S. Coast Guard· Pasquotank County, NC· Construction & real property· Oct 10, 2025 – Oct 10, 2025· HSCG8315CPCR023

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $187.6K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. KANSAS CITY, MO · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $144.9K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $91.3K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $187.6K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $423.9K reported

  1. KANSAS CITY, MO · 4 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. CHANTILLY, VA · 1 subaward · Facilities support services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CHULA VISTA, CA · 81% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Building equipment contractors
  2. BARKLEY ANDROSS CORP.$25.3M−24% in FY2026
    HESPERIA, CA · 81% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Building equipment contractors
  3. DUWRIGHT CONSTRUCTION INC$16.4M−72% in FY2026
    SAN DIEGO, CA · 66% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Building equipment contractors

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.