Federal contractor · MISSOULA, MT

WMA NOXIOUS WEED/RANGE SPECIALISTS LLC

WMA NOXIOUS WEED/RANGE SPECIALISTS LLC received $335.8K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (+70% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.3M. Its largest customer was Bureau of Land Management ($238.1K).

Obligations · FY2026
$335.8K
New awards
6
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
82%
UEI
R6H9W4B11FM1
Small businessEducational institution

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 40.3KFY2017
  2. 48.4KFY2020
  3. 81KFY2021
  4. 105.7KFY2022
  5. 223.1KFY2023
  6. 243.7KFY2024
  7. 197KFY2025
  8. 335.8KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 4 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. Forest Service$33.3K9.9%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$335.8K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition71%
    US 39% · $238.1K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · -$35.8K
  • Single-offer competitions82%
    US 8.7% · $273.9K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Bureau of Land Management· Lemhi County, ID· Facilities & utilities· Jul 15, 2020 – Jul 23, 2026· 140L2520F0012
  2. Bureau of Land Management· Lemhi County, ID· Facilities & utilities· Apr 1, 2026 – Apr 1, 2026· 140L2626F0015
  3. Bureau of Reclamation· Lewis and Clark County, MT· Facilities & utilities· Jul 25, 2025 – Jul 30, 2026· 140R6025P0044
  4. Bureau of Land Management· Missoula County, MT· Facilities & utilities· Aug 6, 2026 – Aug 6, 2026· 140L2626F0040
  5. Bureau of Land Management· Power County, ID· Facilities & utilities· Aug 18, 2026 – Aug 18, 2026· 140L2626F0044
  6. Forest Service· Idaho County, ID· Facilities & utilities· Sep 23, 2026 – Sep 23, 2026· 1284LL26F0110

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MARY CLAIRE KIER$438.1K−107% in FY2026
    ARCATA, CA · 56% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
  2. MOJAVE EQUINE LLC$400K−30% in FY2026
    LLANO, CA · 52% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
  3. LAKOTA-SUNDANCE JV, LLC$630.9K−100% in FY2026
    SITKA, AK · 56% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Other professional, scientific, and technical services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.