Federal contractor · WATER VALLEY, MS

YALOBUSHA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

YALOBUSHA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS received $61.8K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (0% vs FY2025). Since FY2018: $511.4K. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($61.8K).

Obligations · FY2026
$61.8K
New awards
1
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
STT9MJLHX1M8
Other than small businessGovernment entity
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 50.8KFY2018
  2. 52.9KFY2019
  3. 55.1KFY2020
  4. 57.2KFY2021
  5. 59.3KFY2022
  6. 61.5KFY2023
  7. 50.8KFY2024
  8. 61.8KFY2025
  9. 61.8KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$61.8K100%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$61.8K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Yalobusha County, MS$61.8K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $61.8K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $61.8K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Army$61.8K
    Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. THE MISSISSIPPI PROJECT MANAGEMENT OFFICE HAS A MODIFICATION TO EXERCISE NEXT OPTION AND ADD ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT PATROL SERVICES AT GRENADA LAKE AND ENID LAKE WITHIN YALOBUSHA COUNTY$61.8K
    Department of the Army· Yalobusha County, MS· Professional services· Mar 17, 2026 – Mar 17, 2026· W912EE26FA038

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

YALOBUSHA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0
Since FY2021
$3.2M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 2.2MFY2021
  2. 659.8KFY2022
  3. 139.7KFY2023
  4. 120KFY2024

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2021–FY2024.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $2.1M (4 subawards)

1 prime

  1. MISSISSIPPI EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY$2.1M100%
    PEARL, MS · 4 subawards

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $111.4K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $90.1K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $2.1M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $2.3M reported

  1. MISSISSIPPI EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY$2.3M
    PEARL, MS · 6 subawards

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CUSTOM PROTECTIVE SERVICES OF NY, LLC$178K+2.8% in FY2026
    NEW YORK, NY · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Investigation and security services
  2. NICHOLAS COUNTY COMMISSION$181.4K−4.7% in FY2026
    SUMMERSVILLE, WV · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Investigation and security services
  3. COUNTY OF GRENADA$166K+3% in FY2026
    GRENADA, MS · 95% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Investigation and security services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.