Federal contractor · MCDONOUGH, GA

YENRUB CONSULTING GROUP, LLC

YENRUB CONSULTING GROUP, LLC received $85K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−46% vs FY2025). Since FY2024: $286.6K. Its largest customer was Defense Logistics Agency ($43.6K).

Obligations · FY2026
$85K
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
NE6TRFP2FXW5
Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-ownedMinority-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 43.5KFY2024
  2. 158.1KFY2025
  3. 85KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Defense Logistics Agency$43.6K51%
    1 awards
  2. Department of the Army$41.4K49%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$85K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Houston County, GA$43.6K51%
  2. Allegany County, MD$27.3K32%
  3. Fairfax County, VA$14.1K17%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. CUSTODIAL SERVICES IN CUMBERLAND, MD (MD006) AND MARTINSBURG, WV (WV026).$53.8K
    Department of the Army· Allegany County, MD· Facilities & utilities· Jun 10, 2025 – Jun 5, 2026· W15QKN25PA062
  2. 8512017894!LANDSCAPING/GROUNDSKEEPING$43.6K
    Defense Logistics Agency· Houston County, GA· Facilities & utilities· Apr 2, 2026 – Apr 2, 2026· SP330026P0542
  3. CUSTODIAL SERVICES - ALEXANDRIA, VA$41.7K
    Department of the Army· Fairfax County, VA· Facilities & utilities· Mar 29, 2024 – Mar 13, 2026· W15QKN24P5032

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. C.A.L. HOLDINGS, INC$245K
    VICKSBURG, MS · 85% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Services to buildings and dwellings
  2. MRS ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED$247.6K−100% in FY2026
    JEFFERSON CITY, MO · 85% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Services to buildings and dwellings
  3. JONES FAMILY ENTERPRISES, LLC$248.2K+0.7% in FY2026
    ROME, NY · 85% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Services to buildings and dwellings

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.