Federal contractor · CHARLOTTE, NC

Z-MAR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

Z-MAR TECHNOLOGY, INC. received $70.6K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (−17% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1M. Its largest customer was Defense Logistics Agency ($70.6K).

Obligations · FY2026
$70.6K
New awards
5
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
52%
UEI
M71TEJ9GKJL9
Parent company
Z-MAR TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Small businessWoman-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 142.3KFY2017
  2. 92.1KFY2018
  3. 73KFY2019
  4. 48.1KFY2020
  5. 77.9KFY2021
  6. 80.4KFY2022
  7. 118.9KFY2023
  8. 234KFY2024
  9. 85.2KFY2025
  10. 70.6KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 5 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$70.6K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition52%
    US 39% · $36.4K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions52%
    US 8.7% · $36.4K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Defense Logistics Agency· Mecklenburg County, NC· Other equipment & supplies· Dec 22, 2025 – Dec 22, 2025· SPE7M426P1360
  2. Defense Logistics Agency· Mecklenburg County, NC· Other equipment & supplies· Oct 1, 2025 – Oct 1, 2025· SPE7M026V0008
  3. Defense Logistics Agency· Mecklenburg County, NC· Other equipment & supplies· Jan 7, 2026 – Jan 7, 2026· SPE7M226P1194
  4. Defense Logistics Agency· Mecklenburg County, NC· Other equipment & supplies· Nov 18, 2025 – Nov 18, 2025· SPE7M226V0756
  5. Defense Logistics Agency· Mecklenburg County, NC· Other equipment & supplies· Feb 11, 2026 – Feb 11, 2026· SPE7M326V1553

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. HAPCO INC$340.7K−100% in FY2026
    KENT, OH · 82% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Commercial and service industry machinery manufacturing
  2. BEST IN THE WEST SAFETY INC$341.4K−100% in FY2026
    LAS VEGAS, NV · 82% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Commercial and service industry machinery manufacturing
  3. SPECTRO-UV, LLC$387.1K−85% in FY2026
    FARMINGDALE, NY · 82% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Commercial and service industry machinery manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.