Federal contractor · MONTGOMERY, AL

ZEALRIVER TECHNOLOGIES INC

ZEALRIVER TECHNOLOGIES INC received $721.9K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−6.5% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $5.3M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($721.9K).

Obligations · FY2026
$721.9K
New awards
3
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
JQBCLL745MQ8
Small businessWoman-ownedMinority-owned8(a) program
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 26.6KFY2017
  2. 19.5KFY2018
  3. 13.8KFY2019
  4. 166.3KFY2020
  5. 169.6KFY2021
  6. 173KFY2022
  7. 179.3KFY2023
  8. 3.1MFY2024
  9. 772.5KFY2025
  10. 721.9KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Air Force$721.9K100%
    3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$560.5K78%
  2. Education & social services$161.4K22%

Where the work was performed

  1. Montgomery County, AL$560.5K78%
  2. Bossier Parish, LA$161.4K22%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $721.9K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $721.9K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Air Force$721.9K
    Department of Defense · 2 awards

Largest awards

  1. EDUCATION SUPPORT SERVICES$334.9K
    Department of the Air Force· Bossier Parish, LA· Education & social services· Oct 1, 2024 – Mar 12, 2026· FA460825C0001
  2. AFCLC ARGO$284.1K
    Department of the Air Force· Montgomery County, AL· Professional services· May 29, 2026 – May 29, 2026· FA330026C0024
  3. ARGO SUPPORT$276.4K
    Department of the Air Force· Montgomery County, AL· Professional services· Mar 31, 2026 – Mar 31, 2026· FA330026C0012

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $448.9K reported

  1. SOLUTIONS71, LLC$448.9K
    LEESBURG, VA · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BRITTINGHAM SOFTWARE DESIGN INC$2.9M−89% in FY2026
    CALIFON, NJ · 71% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Software publishers
  2. PLURIBUS INC$4.5M−100% in FY2026
    MC LEAN, VA · 76% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Software publishers
  3. ALPINE METHOD TECHNOLOGIES, LLC$4.7M
    CHANTILLY, VA · 76% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Software publishers

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.