Federal sub-agency · Department of Homeland Security

Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction

No contract obligations recorded for Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction in FY2026. It also awarded $8.6M in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
Actions
0
New awards: 0
Sole-source
—
Small business
—
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graphFederal contracts

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

Top recipients

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Federal grants & assistance awarded

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction obligated $8.6M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 20 actions (0 new awards), +471% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 97.091 · Homeland Security Biowatch Program ($8.1M).

Assistance · FY2026
$8.6M
New awards
0
Actions
20
Since FY2021
$223.1M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 67.2MFY2021
  2. 56.1MFY2022
  3. 33.3MFY2023
  4. 56.5MFY2024
  5. 1.5MFY2025
  6. 8.6MFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$8.6M100%

Top programs

  1. 97.091 · Homeland Security Biowatch Program$8.1M95%
  2. 97.106 · Securing the Cities Program$433.7K5.1%

Top recipients (organizations)

  1. CITY OF ATLANTA$433.7K5.1%
    ATLANTA, GA
  2. UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE$00.0%
    KNOXVILLE, TN
  3. BOARD OF REGENTS OF NEVADA SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION$00.0%
    LAS VEGAS, NV
  4. GEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORP$00.0%
    ATLANTA, GA

Where it went

  1. Washington$1.5M17%
  2. Maryland$1.3M16%
  3. Pennsylvania$1.1M13%
  4. Nevada$1.1M13%
  5. Georgia$841.6K9.8%
  6. Florida$727.7K8.5%
  7. Illinois$460.4K5.4%
  8. Indiana$394.9K4.6%
  9. Ohio$391.1K4.6%
  10. Colorado$336K3.9%

By state of the place of performance.

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Federal grants & assistance

Subawards under this agency's awards

First-tier subawards that recipients of this agency's contracts and financial assistance reported, by the fiscal year of the subaward.

FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $50K (1 subaward)

1 sub-recipient

Largest sub-recipients

  1. SEATTLE, CITY OF$50K100%
    SEATTLE, WA · 1 subaward

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Committees that oversee and fund it

Congressional committees whose jurisdiction includes this agency, and the appropriations subcommittees that write its spending bill (Analisa's reading of the House and Senate rules; committees share jurisdiction). Leaders as currently published.

…

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.