Scores by category

Each category averages its indicators' percentile scores among US cities and towns.

Safety10#14,056/15,637
Economy62#6,013/15,631
Housing89#1,634/14,977
Health27#11,332/15,609
Healthcare69#4,798/15,650
Environment8#14,237/15,453
Education17#12,911/15,649
Infrastructure74#4,042/15,650
Community35#10,207/15,651
Leisure & amenities76#3,826/15,651

Strengths · Weaknesses

Indicators where Glenpool, Oklahoma ranks highest and lowest among US cities and towns (score = percentile, 100 = best). Values marked “Tulsa County value” are the county’s: the source publishes no figure for this city or town, and the county holding most of its residents stands in.

Strengths

Distance to an airport · low10 mi
92/100Oklahoma 36 miUnited States 33 mi2025Federal Aviation Administration · Bureau of Transportation Statistics · U.S. Census BureauTulsa County value
Distance to an emergency room · low3.2 mi
90/100Oklahoma 5.8 miUnited States 5.5 miJul 2026Centers for Medicare & Medicaid ServicesTulsa County value
Hospital quality rating · high4.2
89/100Oklahoma 3.3United States 3.2Jul 2026Centers for Medicare & Medicaid ServicesTulsa County value
Rent-burdened households · low42.5%
87/100Oklahoma 46.3%United States 51.1%2020-2024U.S. Census Bureau Census table B25070
Mental health providers · high504 /100k
87/100Oklahoma 439 /100kUnited States 348 /100k2025University of Wisconsin Population Health InstituteTulsa County value
Primary care physicians · high106 /100k
86/100Oklahoma 60 /100kUnited States 76 /100k2022University of Wisconsin Population Health InstituteTulsa County value

Weaknesses

Property crime rate · high2,464 /100k
5/100Oklahoma 1,814 /100kUnited States 1,535 /100k2025Federal Bureau of InvestigationTulsa County value
Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) · high9.4 µg/m³
5/100Oklahoma 8.8 µg/m³United States 8.0 µg/m³2022Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyTulsa County value
Violent crime rate · high559 /100k
6/100Oklahoma 408 /100kUnited States 328 /100k2025Federal Bureau of InvestigationTulsa County value
Depression · high28.9%
8/100Oklahoma 26.0%United States 20.7%2023Centers for Disease Control and PreventionModel-based estimate
Distance to an Amtrak station · high100 mi
10/100Oklahoma 61 miUnited States 43 mi2026Federal Aviation Administration · Bureau of Transportation Statistics · U.S. Census BureauTulsa County value
Voter turnout · low54.8%
11/100Oklahoma 53.8%United States 65.2%2024U.S. Election Assistance CommissionTulsa County value

Trends

The largest changes over about five years, next to the country's over the same periods.

New homes permittedWorsening
12.1 /1k (2021) → 1.1 /1k (Sep 2025–Aug 2026)
−91%5 yearsUS 5.2 /1k → 4.2 /1k
Home price to income ratioWorsening
2.1× (2015-2019) → 2.5× (2020-2024)
+24%5 yearsCensus table B25077US 3.5× → 4.1×
Median household incomeImproving
$67,703 (2015-2019) → $79,525 (2020-2024)
+17%5 yearsCensus table B19013US $65,712 → $81,604
Child poverty rateImproving
14.1% (2015-2019) → 10.7% (2020-2024)
−3.4 pts5 yearsCensus table B17001US 16.8% → 15.5%
Broadband subscriptionsImproving
92.8% (2015-2019) → 95.7% (2020-2024)
+2.9 pts5 yearsCensus table B28002US 82.7% → 91.0%
Rent-burdened householdsWorsening
40.2% (2015-2019) → 42.5% (2020-2024)
+2.3 pts5 yearsCensus table B25070US 49.6% → 51.1%

What changed in five years

How each measure moved between two periods about five years apart, read against whether more or less is better, the published margin of error and the same change in other places.

Over about five years, Glenpool, Oklahoma improved on 1 of 14 measures with a comparison and declined on 1. 11 moved within the margin of error and 1 barely changed.

Earlier (2015-2019)
Latest (2020-2024)
Lower standingHigher standing

Position is the place's standing among cities and towns: further right is better, whichever way the measure counts.

Improved1

Household income+17%$67,703 → $79,525

Declined1

Price / income+0.5×2.1× → 2.5×

All 14 measures

Change of every measure of Glenpool, Oklahoma between two periods about five years apart
Measure	Before	After	Change	Reading	Favourable vs peers
Average commute time	22.9 min2015-2019	24.3 min2020-2024	+1.5 min	Within the margin of error	32%
Bachelor's degree or higher	25.4%2015-2019	26.3%2020-2024	+1 points	Within the margin of error	34%
Broadband subscriptions	92.8%2015-2019	95.7%2020-2024	+2.9 points	Within the margin of error	19%
Child poverty rate	14.1%2015-2019	10.7%2020-2024	−3.4 points	Within the margin of error	63%
Effective property tax rate	1.14%2015-2019	0.90%2020-2024	−0.2 points	Little change	66%
High school diploma or higher	91.2%2015-2019	91.8%2020-2024	+0.6 points	Within the margin of error	41%
Home price to income ratio	2.1×2015-2019	2.5×2020-2024	+0.5×	Declined	49%
Income inequality (Gini index)	0.4012015-2019	0.4242020-2024	+0.024	Within the margin of error	31%
Median household income	$67,7032015-2019	$79,5252020-2024	+17%	Improved	28%
Poverty rate	9.7%2015-2019	11.0%2020-2024	+1.2 points	Within the margin of error	32%
Rent as share of income	25.2%2015-2019	26.1%2020-2024	+0.9 points	Within the margin of error	47%
Rent-burdened households	40.2%2015-2019	42.5%2020-2024	+2.3 points	Within the margin of error	47%
Unemployment rate	3.4%2015-2019	3.3%2020-2024	−0.2 points	Within the margin of error	53%
Uninsured residents (under 65)	12.8%2015-2019	13.8%2020-2024	+1 points	Within the margin of error	35%

“Against peers” compares the change with the same change in the 14640 cities and towns that have the same two periods. It describes how common a change is, not why it happened.

Sources: American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. Values are the latest and the one five years earlier of the same publisher dataset; datasets that changed publisher in between are never compared.

Survey estimates (American Community Survey) compare the two most recent 5-year windows that do not share years, so the margin of error of the difference holds. The 2015-2019 window predates the pandemic and 2020-2024 includes it.
A change counts only when it is larger than 1.645 times the square root of the two standard errors squared, summed (a 90% margin). Measures published without a margin must change by at least 5% to count.
“Against peers” compares the change with the same change in the 15651 cities and towns that have the same two periods. It describes how common a change is, not why it happened.
Standing is a percentile among the same places: 0 is the lowest value on the measure (or the worst when lower is better), 100 the best.

Cities and towns like Glenpool, Oklahoma five years ago that improved

The places whose measures looked most like those of Glenpool, Oklahoma in the earlier period, ranked by how many measures improved beyond the margin of error, minus how many declined. A comparison of published data, not a forecast and not advice.

For comparison, Glenpool, Oklahoma itself moved −6 points in standing on average over the same 10 measures (standings of all places average about zero).

How the ranking works

Similarity is the root-mean-square difference of standings in the earlier period over the measures most places have. Places are ranked by measures that improved beyond the margin of error minus those that declined (a count that estimation noise in small places cannot inflate), then by the mean change of standing over the measures a place has in both periods. Only places with more improvements than declines and a rise in standing are listed. Standings are relative, so a place can improve in absolute terms and still lose standing.

Who lives here

Age, race and education of residents, from the American Community Survey. Shares are of all residents (age), residents of every origin (race) or adults 25 and over (education).

Age and sex

14,151 residents (±44)

Men
Women

80 and over†
70–79
60–69†
50–59
40–49
30–39
20–29
10–19
Under 10

Share of all residents, each sex

Biggest shift since 2015–2019: Under 10 women (−2.5 points).

† Wide margin of error (more than 30% of the estimate): read with care.

Table view

American Community Survey 5-year estimates, 2020–2024 · Table B01001View table on data.census.gov

Race and Hispanic origin

14,151 residents (±44)

Glenpool, Oklahoma
Oklahoma share

White63%8,883
Black3.8%†536
Hispanic or Latino9.8%†1,381

Education

9,171 residents (±276)

Glenpool, Oklahoma
Oklahoma share

No high school diploma8.2%750
High school or GED28%2,599
Some college25%2,307

Counts are survey estimates, each with a margin of error. The grouping into ranges is ours; every count is the Census Bureau's.

Income

How household income is spread, not just the middle: each bar is the share of households in that income range.

Household income

5,039 households (±226)

Glenpool, Oklahoma
Oklahoma share

Under $25k13%659
$25k–50k15%737
$50k–75k18%916
$75k–100k16%799
$100k–150k25%1,254
$150k–200k7.8%†394
$200k or more5.6%†280

Biggest shift since 2015–2019: $100k–150k (+6.9 points).

† Wide margin of error (more than 30% of the estimate): read with care.

Table view

American Community Survey 5-year estimates, 2020–2024 · Table B19001View table on data.census.gov

Counts are survey estimates, each with a margin of error. The grouping into ranges is ours; every count is the Census Bureau's.

Homes

Who owns and who rents, what homes cost, and what the housing stock looks like.

Owners and renters

5,039 households (±226)

Glenpool, Oklahoma
Oklahoma share

Own69%3,490
Rent31%1,549

No change since 2015–2019 is larger than the margin of error.

Table view

American Community Survey 5-year estimates, 2020–2024 · Table B25003View table on data.census.gov

Rent paid

1,478 households (±246)

Glenpool, Oklahoma
Oklahoma share

Under $75011%†165
$750–1,0007.8%†115
$1,000–1,50047%†702

Home values

3,490 homes (±260)

Glenpool, Oklahoma
Oklahoma share

Under $150k28%984
$150k–250k38%1,324
$250k–400k29%1,012

Age of homes

5,149 homes (±234)

Glenpool, Oklahoma
Oklahoma share

2010 or later25%1,287
2000–200921%1,085
1980–199932%1,648

Size of homes

5,149 homes (±234)

Glenpool, Oklahoma
Oklahoma share

Studio0.5%†26
1 bedroom6.0%†311
2 bedrooms13%†695

Counts are survey estimates, each with a margin of error. The grouping into ranges is ours; every count is the Census Bureau's.

Getting to work

How workers travel to their job and how long it takes them.

How people get to work

7,563 workers (±441)

Glenpool, Oklahoma
Oklahoma share

Drive alone81%6,161
Carpool11%837
Public transit0.0%0
Walk0.9%†71
Bike0.3%†24
Work from home5.4%†408
Other0.8%†62

Biggest shift since 2015–2019: Work from home (+2.8 points).

† Wide margin of error (more than 30% of the estimate): read with care.

Table view

American Community Survey 5-year estimates, 2020–2024 · Table B08301View table on data.census.gov

Time to get to work

7,155 workers (±459)

Glenpool, Oklahoma
Oklahoma share

Under 15 min21%1,470
15–29 min45%3,186
30–44 min26%1,860

Counts are survey estimates, each with a margin of error. The grouping into ranges is ours; every count is the Census Bureau's.

Jobs and pay

What the largest occupations here pay, from the Bureau of Labor Statistics' Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes pay by metro area, not by county or city. The metro area page lists its largest occupations and lets you look up any job.

Pay in the Tulsa, OK

Local businesses

Employer businesses and sole proprietors by industry, per resident and against the state and the nation. Counts of businesses next to counts of people, not a measure of demand.

The Census Bureau publishes business counts by county, not by city, so these are the figures of Tulsa County, the county holding most of Glenpool's residents.

Tulsa County has 19,556 employer establishments, 285 for every 10,000 residents (1.15× the US rate of 248; 1.20× Oklahoma's), with 329,036 paid employees at an average annual pay of $59,264. The Census Bureau also counts 63,096 nonemployer businesses, mostly sole proprietors.

Establishments: 19,556; 63,096 nonemployers
Per 10,000 residents: 285; US 248 · Oklahoma 237
Paid employees: 329,036
Average annual pay: $59,264; US $68,342

Employer establishments, employees, average pay and nonemployers of Tulsa County by industry, with the density per resident against the nation

Ambulatory health care services	1,809	26.4	1.26×More than typical	21,306	$76,740	2,647
Restaurants and other eating places	1,429	20.8	1.13×About typical	31,282	$20,844	346
Specialty trade contractors	1,099	16	1.03×About typical	11,172	$61,628	4,083
Lessors of real estate	929	13.5	1.10×About typical	3,412	$53,024	6,510
Limited-service restaurants	624	9.1	1.13×About typical	13,572	$17,990	131
Offices of physicians	619	9	1.39×More than typical	7,425	$119,836	586
Full-service restaurants	601	8.8	1.14×About typical	15,212	$23,637	166
Offices of other health practitioners	565	8.2	1.35×More than typical	2,919	$48,925	1,315
Legal services	562	8.2	1.52×More than typical	3,446	$86,893	765
Religious organizations	536	7.8	1.41×More than typical	6,630	$30,143	—
Management, scientific and technical consulting	509	7.4	1.11×About typical	2,426	$87,932	2,263
Insurance agencies and brokerages	477	7	1.58×More than typical	2,468	$71,874	1,094

Rank places for an industry Open Tulsa County

County Business Patterns (2023); Nonemployer Statistics (2024)

Per-resident figures divide by the population estimate of 2023: 686,287 residents here, 336,755,052 in the United States. County Business Patterns counts establishments in 2023; the Nonemployer Statistics count businesses in 2024.
“More than typical” is a density at least 1.25 times the nation's per resident, “fewer” at most 0.8 times, with at least 10 establishments. It compares counts of businesses with counts of people: it says nothing about demand, incomes, size, quality or profit, and visitors and commuters are not residents.
The Census Bureau adds noise to employment and payroll to protect confidentiality, and withholds some figures: an industry with few establishments can show employees or pay as unavailable.
Industries overlap: a narrower industry (full-service restaurants) is part of a broader one (restaurants), so the rows do not add up.
Industries follow the North American Industry Classification System; the two surveys use different editions (NAICS 2017 and 2022), which this page matches industry by industry.

Federal contracts performed here

In FY2026, an estimated $0 of federal contract obligations were for work performed in Glenpool, Oklahoma: $0 per resident (US $1,994).

Obligations: $0
Per resident: $0; US $1,994
Sole-source: —; US 30%
Single offer: —; US 8.8%

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Top buying agencies

Top recipients

Spending by fiscal year

349.4KFY2017
77.7KFY2018
55KFY2019
246.8KFY2020
352.9KFY2021
26.9KFY2022
20.6KFY2023
58.8KFY2024

What was bought

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.

How this is estimated

Agencies report each contract action's place of performance as a county and a ZIP code. A ZIP code's money is split among the cities it covers by the share of its land inside each (Census 2020 ZIP code tabulation areas); the part outside city limits stays with the county.

The place of performance is what the contracting agency reports, often the contractor's office rather than where the work happens.
Shares are of land, not of people or businesses: a ZIP code that is mostly rural land but has its offices in town gives the town less than it should.
ZIP codes that are not mapped areas (post office boxes, the unique ZIP codes of large federal sites and companies) stay with their county, unless one city covers nearly all of it.
Counts of actions and awards include those only partly in Glenpool, Oklahoma, so they do not add up across cities.

Glenpool, Oklahoma's figures are part of those of Tulsa County, OK ($264.6M in FY2026), never added to them: 0.0% of that total.

Grants and other federal assistance are counted by county here, not split among cities: Glenpool is mostly in Tulsa County.

See federal money in Tulsa County

Representation in Congress

Members serving today, with their record in the current Congress (party-unity votes cast with their caucus, roll calls missed). Not a grade.

Glenpool, Oklahoma is represented in the 119th Congress by these members.

House

Kevin HernR-OK-1 · 100% of residentsWith party 99%Missed 2.4%

Senate

Explore Congress The 2026 races

County

A city can lie in several counties. Some indicators are published for counties only: the page marks them.

Tulsa County50100% of residents

Metro area

The metro or micro area the city belongs to.

Tulsa, OK42

Other cities and towns in Tulsa County

Largest first.

Similar cities and towns

Closest indicator profiles across the country (no model: score distances).

Data and sources

Latest published value of each indicator; periods differ by source. Values flagged by their publisher are marked.

PLACES: Local Data for Better HealthCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · release 2025
Local Area Unemployment StatisticsU.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · release 2025
American Community Survey 5-Year EstimatesU.S. Census Bureau · release 2017-2024
Building Permits SurveyU.S. Census Bureau · release 2026-08
Population Estimates ProgramU.S. Census Bureau · release 2025
Small Area Health Insurance EstimatesU.S. Census Bureau · release 2024
Small Area Income and Poverty EstimatesU.S. Census Bureau · release 2024
County Health Rankings & RoadmapsUniversity of Wisconsin Population Health Institute · release 2022-2025+2026-03-supplement

JSON · /api/v1/places/4029600