Census-designated place · Washington County, Oregon

Raleigh Hills, Oregon

Raleigh Hills is a census-designated place in Washington County, Oregon, part of the Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA metro area. It has 6,744 residents. Raleigh Hills, Oregon has a quality-of-life score of 86 out of 100 (very high), ranking #2,170 of 15,651 US cities and towns. Within Oregon it ranks #18 of 227 cities and towns. It ranks best on physical inactivity (low), traffic deaths (low) and mental health providers (high). It ranks worst on income inequality (Gini index) (high), home price to income ratio (high) and job growth (low).

86Very high

Quality-of-life score: #2,170 of 15,651 cities and towns
Oregon: #18 of 227 in OR
Population: 6,744 (2020-2024)
Land area: 2 mi²
Density: 4,443.2 /mi²
FIPS code: 4160900

Percentile-based score (100 is the best in the country) from 72 of 80 indicators, with the default “Explorer” weights.

Open in the map

Scores by category

Each category averages its indicators' percentile scores among US cities and towns.

Safety67#5,207/15,637
Economy67#5,089/15,631
Housing13#12,990/14,977
Health90#1,528/15,609
Healthcare92#1,247/15,650
Environment64#5,495/15,453
Education83#2,673/15,649
Infrastructure99#154/15,650
Community75#3,894/15,651
Leisure & amenities69#4,872/15,651

Strengths · Weaknesses

Indicators where Raleigh Hills, Oregon ranks highest and lowest among US cities and towns (score = percentile, 100 = best). Values marked “Washington County value” are the county’s: the source publishes no figure for this city or town, and the county holding most of its residents stands in.

Strengths

Physical inactivity · low14.2%
97/100Oregon 20.9%United States 26.5%2023University of Wisconsin Population Health InstituteModel-based estimate
Traffic deaths · low5.0 /100k
95/100Oregon 13.3 /100kUnited States 12.3 /100k2020-2024National Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationProvisional dataWashington County value
Mental health providers · high643 /100k
95/100Oregon 776 /100kUnited States 348 /100k2025University of Wisconsin Population Health InstituteWashington County value
Premature death · low4,904 /100k
94/100Oregon 7,519 /100kUnited States 8,123 /100k2021-2023University of Wisconsin Population Health InstituteWashington County value
Average weekly wage · high$1,731
93/100Oregon $1,417United States $1,5142025U.S. Bureau of Labor StatisticsWashington County value
Adult smoking · low8.2%
93/100Oregon 14.4%United States 16.1%2023University of Wisconsin Population Health InstituteModel-based estimate

Weaknesses

Income inequality (Gini index) · high0.575
2/100Oregon 0.463United States 0.4832020-2024U.S. Census Bureau Census table B19083
Home price to income ratio · high7.6×
5/100Oregon 5.8×United States 4.1×2020-2024U.S. Census Bureau Census table B25077
Job growth · low-2.7%
8/100Oregon -1.3%United States 0.1%2026 Q1U.S. Bureau of Labor StatisticsProvisional dataWashington County value
Pharmacies · low1.0 /10k
14/100Oregon 0.9 /10kUnited States 1.8 /10k2025U.S. Bureau of Labor StatisticsWashington County value
Students per teacher · high17.9×
15/100Oregon 17.8×United States 15.2×2024National Center for Education StatisticsWashington County value
Public libraries · low0.3 /10k
17/100Oregon 0.5 /10kUnited States 0.5 /10k2024Institute of Museum and Library ServicesWashington County value

Trends

The largest changes over about five years, next to the country's over the same periods.

PopulationRising
6,146 (2015-2019) → 6,744 (2020-2024)
+9.7%5 yearsCensus table B01003US 328,329,953 → 340,003,797
Broadband subscriptionsImproving
83.4% (2015-2019) → 95.9% (2020-2024)
+13 pts5 yearsCensus table B28002US 82.7% → 91.0%
Median household incomeImproving
$82,745 (2015-2019) → $120,000 (2020-2024)
+45%5 yearsCensus table B19013US $65,712 → $81,604
High school diploma or higherWorsening
98.4% (2015-2019) → 93.2% (2020-2024)
−5.2 pts5 yearsCensus table B15003US 88.0% → 89.6%
Income inequality (Gini index)Worsening
0.492 (2015-2019) → 0.575 (2020-2024)
+17%5 yearsCensus table B19083US 0.482 → 0.483
Public transit commutersWorsening
5.6% (2015-2019) → 2.9% (2020-2024)
−2.8 pts5 yearsCensus table B08301US 5.0% → 3.2%

What changed in five years

How each measure moved between two periods about five years apart, read against whether more or less is better, the published margin of error and the same change in other places.

Over about five years, Raleigh Hills, Oregon improved on 2 of 12 measures with a comparison and declined on 1. 9 moved within the margin of error and 0 barely changed.

Earlier (2015-2019)
Latest (2020-2024)
Lower standingHigher standing

Position is the place's standing among cities and towns: further right is better, whichever way the measure counts.

Improved2

Household income+45%$82,745 → $120,000
Broadband+13 points83.4% → 95.9%

Declined1

Inequality+0.0820.492 → 0.575

All 12 measures

Change of every measure of Raleigh Hills, Oregon between two periods about five years apart
Measure	Before	After	Change	Reading	Favourable vs peers
Average commute time	21.2 min2015-2019	20.6 min2020-2024	−0.5 min	Within the margin of error	54%
Bachelor's degree or higher	60.3%2015-2019	57.8%2020-2024	−2.6 points	Within the margin of error	14%
Broadband subscriptions	83.4%2015-2019	95.9%2020-2024	+13 points	Improved	71%
Effective property tax rate	1.00%2015-2019	0.87%2020-2024	−0.1 points	Within the margin of error	42%
High school diploma or higher	98.4%2015-2019	93.2%2020-2024	−5.2 points	Within the margin of error	5%
Home price to income ratio	8.2×2015-2019	7.6×2020-2024	−0.5×	Within the margin of error	94%
Income inequality (Gini index)	0.4922015-2019	0.5752020-2024	+0.082	Declined	7%
Median household income	$82,7452015-2019	$120,0002020-2024	+45%	Improved	80%
Poverty rate	5.4%2015-2019	7.0%2020-2024	+1.6 points	Within the margin of error	29%
Rent as share of income	32.2%2015-2019	32.4%2020-2024	+0.2 points	Within the margin of error	54%
Rent-burdened households	54.6%2015-2019	51.9%2020-2024	−2.7 points	Within the margin of error	66%
Unemployment rate	2.6%2015-2019	4.9%2020-2024	+2.3 points	Within the margin of error	14%

“Against peers” compares the change with the same change in the 14640 cities and towns that have the same two periods. It describes how common a change is, not why it happened.

Sources: American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. Values are the latest and the one five years earlier of the same publisher dataset; datasets that changed publisher in between are never compared.

Survey estimates (American Community Survey) compare the two most recent 5-year windows that do not share years, so the margin of error of the difference holds. The 2015-2019 window predates the pandemic and 2020-2024 includes it.
A change counts only when it is larger than 1.645 times the square root of the two standard errors squared, summed (a 90% margin). Measures published without a margin must change by at least 5% to count.
“Against peers” compares the change with the same change in the 15651 cities and towns that have the same two periods. It describes how common a change is, not why it happened.
Standing is a percentile among the same places: 0 is the lowest value on the measure (or the worst when lower is better), 100 the best.

Cities and towns like Raleigh Hills, Oregon five years ago that improved

The places whose measures looked most like those of Raleigh Hills, Oregon in the earlier period, ranked by how many measures improved beyond the margin of error, minus how many declined. A comparison of published data, not a forecast and not advice.

For comparison, Raleigh Hills, Oregon itself moved +0.3 points in standing on average over the same 10 measures (standings of all places average about zero).

How the ranking works

Similarity is the root-mean-square difference of standings in the earlier period over the measures most places have. Places are ranked by measures that improved beyond the margin of error minus those that declined (a count that estimation noise in small places cannot inflate), then by the mean change of standing over the measures a place has in both periods. Only places with more improvements than declines and a rise in standing are listed. Standings are relative, so a place can improve in absolute terms and still lose standing.

Who lives here

Age, race and education of residents, from the American Community Survey. Shares are of all residents (age), residents of every origin (race) or adults 25 and over (education).

Age and sex

6,744 residents (±938)

Men
Women

80 and over†
70–79†
60–69†

Income

How household income is spread, not just the middle: each bar is the share of households in that income range.

Household income

3,228 households (±412)

Raleigh Hills, Oregon
Oregon share

Under $25k14%†447
$25k–50k5.9%†189
$50k–75k

Homes

Who owns and who rents, what homes cost, and what the housing stock looks like.

Owners and renters

3,228 households (±412)

Raleigh Hills, Oregon
Oregon share

Own53%1,705
Rent47%1,523

No change since 2015–2019 is larger than the margin of error.

Table view

Getting to work

How workers travel to their job and how long it takes them.

How people get to work

3,574 workers (±654)

Raleigh Hills, Oregon
Oregon share

Drive alone65%2,310
Carpool3.1%†110
Public transit2.9%†

Jobs and pay

What the largest occupations here pay, from the Bureau of Labor Statistics' Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes pay by metro area, not by county or city. The metro area page lists its largest occupations and lets you look up any job.

Pay in the Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA

Local businesses

Employer businesses and sole proprietors by industry, per resident and against the state and the nation. Counts of businesses next to counts of people, not a measure of demand.

The Census Bureau publishes business counts by county, not by city, so these are the figures of Washington County, the county holding most of Raleigh Hills's residents.

Washington County has 16,355 employer establishments, 271 for every 10,000 residents (1.09× the US rate of 248; 0.94× Oregon's), with 307,351 paid employees at an average annual pay of $87,499. The Census Bureau also counts 46,094 nonemployer businesses, mostly sole proprietors.

Establishments: 16,355; 46,094 nonemployers
Per 10,000 residents: 271; US 248 · Oregon 288
Paid employees: 307,351
Average annual pay: $87,499; US $68,342

Employer establishments, employees, average pay and nonemployers of Washington County by industry, with the density per resident against the nation

Ambulatory health care services	1,364	22.6	1.08×About typical	16,520	$73,059	2,126
Restaurants and other eating places	1,146	19	1.03×About typical	20,132	$26,866	215
Specialty trade contractors	1,081	17.9	1.16×About typical	13,637	$83,072	1,460
Lessors of real estate	960	15.9	1.29×More than typical	4,381	$62,553	4,580
Construction of buildings	689	11.4	1.51×More than typical	4,032	$77,678	942
Services to buildings and dwellings	646	10.7	1.59×More than typical	5,810	$46,824	1,732
Offices of other health practitioners	492	8.1	1.34×More than typical	3,627	$49,678	1,251
Limited-service restaurants	475	7.9	0.98×About typical	8,745	$24,286	112
Management, scientific and technical consulting	475	7.9	1.17×About typical	3,427	$119,325	2,228
Building finishing contractors	459	7.6	2.00×More than typical	3,399	$63,501	525
Full-service restaurants	458	7.6	0.99×About typical	8,388	$30,907	68
Real estate agents and brokers	395	6.5	1.34×More than typical	1,017	$74,350	1,345

Rank places for an industry Open Washington County

County Business Patterns (2023); Nonemployer Statistics (2024)

Per-resident figures divide by the population estimate of 2023: 603,856 residents here, 336,755,052 in the United States. County Business Patterns counts establishments in 2023; the Nonemployer Statistics count businesses in 2024.
“More than typical” is a density at least 1.25 times the nation's per resident, “fewer” at most 0.8 times, with at least 10 establishments. It compares counts of businesses with counts of people: it says nothing about demand, incomes, size, quality or profit, and visitors and commuters are not residents.
The Census Bureau adds noise to employment and payroll to protect confidentiality, and withholds some figures: an industry with few establishments can show employees or pay as unavailable.
Industries overlap: a narrower industry (full-service restaurants) is part of a broader one (restaurants), so the rows do not add up.
Industries follow the North American Industry Classification System; the two surveys use different editions (NAICS 2017 and 2022), which this page matches industry by industry.

Federal contracts performed here

In FY2026, an estimated $243.9K of federal contract obligations were for work performed in Raleigh Hills, Oregon: $36.16 per resident (US $1,995).

Obligations: $243.9K; +95% vs FY2025
Per resident: $36.16; US $1,995
Sole-source: 9.5%; US 30%
Single offer: 0.0%; US 8.8%

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Top buying agencies

Bureau of Reclamation$193.3K79%
Defense Logistics Agency$25.4K10%
Social Security Administration$14K5.7%
Department of Veterans Affairs$9,2623.8%
Forest Service$1,6440.7%
U.S. Coast Guard$1,2380.5%
U.S. Geological Survey$6170.3%
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service$1450.1%

Top recipients

S&F LAND SERVICES, LLC$193.3K79%
SYLVAN FOREST PRODUCTS INC$25K10%
DAVID GEORGE HOUGH$14K5.7%
HANGER PROSTHETICS & ORTHOTICS, INC.$9,2623.8%
STEVENS MARINE INC$2,4061.0%

Spending by fiscal year

3.1MFY2017
928KFY2018
199.5KFY2019
175.6KFY2020
208.1KFY2021
166.6KFY2022
232.8KFY2023
81.7K

Top industries (NAICS)

Architectural, engineering, and related services · 5413$193.3K79%
Veneer, plywood, and engineered wood product manufacturing · 3212$25.4K10%
Offices of physicians · 6211$14K5.7%
Medical equipment and supplies manufacturing · 3391$9,2623.8%
Ship and boat building · 3366$2,4061.0%
Converted paper product manufacturing · 3222

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.

How this is estimated

Agencies report each contract action's place of performance as a county and a ZIP code. A ZIP code's money is split among the cities it covers by the share of its land inside each (Census 2020 ZIP code tabulation areas); the part outside city limits stays with the county.

The place of performance is what the contracting agency reports, often the contractor's office rather than where the work happens.
Shares are of land, not of people or businesses: a ZIP code that is mostly rural land but has its offices in town gives the town less than it should.
ZIP codes that are not mapped areas (post office boxes, the unique ZIP codes of large federal sites and companies) stay with their county, unless one city covers nearly all of it.
Counts of actions and awards include those only partly in Raleigh Hills, Oregon, so they do not add up across cities.

Raleigh Hills, Oregon's figures are part of those of Washington County, OR ($71.7M in FY2026), never added to them: 0.3% of that total.

Grants and other federal assistance are counted by county here, not split among cities: Raleigh Hills is mostly in Washington County.

See federal money in Washington County

Representation in Congress

Members serving today, with their record in the current Congress (party-unity votes cast with their caucus, roll calls missed). Not a grade.

Raleigh Hills, Oregon is split between congressional districts: each representative is shown with the share of its residents in their district (current boundaries).

House

Senate

County

A city can lie in several counties. Some indicators are published for counties only: the page marks them.

Washington County88100% of residents

Metro area

The metro or micro area the city belongs to.

Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA80

Other cities and towns in Washington County

Largest first.

Similar cities and towns

Closest indicator profiles across the country (no model: score distances).

Data and sources

Latest published value of each indicator; periods differ by source. Values flagged by their publisher are marked.

PLACES: Local Data for Better HealthCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · release 2025
Local Area Unemployment StatisticsU.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · release 2025
American Community Survey 5-Year EstimatesU.S. Census Bureau · release 2017-2024
Population Estimates ProgramU.S. Census Bureau · release 2025
Small Area Health Insurance EstimatesU.S. Census Bureau · release 2024
Small Area Income and Poverty EstimatesU.S. Census Bureau · release 2024
County Health Rankings & RoadmapsUniversity of Wisconsin Population Health Institute · release 2022-2025+2026-03-supplement

JSON · /api/v1/places/4160900

Scores by category

Strengths · Weaknesses

Strengths

Weaknesses

Trends