H.R. 2062 · 117th Congress

Protecting Older Workers Against Discrimination Act of 2021

Introduced on Mar 18, 2021 by Robert C. "Bobby" Scott (D-VA-3). 112 cosponsors, 14 of them from another party. Latest action (Jun 24, 2021): Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

Stage
Passed one chamber
Introduced
Mar 18, 2021
Cosponsors
112
14 from the other party
Policy area
Labor and Employment

Progress

The furthest stage the measure reached. Simple and concurrent resolutions do not go to the President.

  1. Introduced
  2. Reported by committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. 4Passed both chambers
  5. 5Sent to the President
  6. 6Became law

Official title

To amend the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 and other laws to clarify appropriate standards for Federal employment discrimination and retaliation claims, and for other purposes.

Subjects

  • Age discrimination
  • Civil actions and liability
  • Congressional oversight
  • Disability and health-based discrimination
  • Employment discrimination and employee rights
  • Evidence and witnesses
  • Government employee pay, benefits, personnel management
  • Government studies and investigations
  • Racial and ethnic relations
  • Sex, gender, sexual orientation discrimination
  • Women's employment

Summary

By the Congressional Research Service (Passed House, Jun 23, 2021). Public domain.

Protecting Older Workers Against Discrimination Act of 2021

This bill revises the evidentiary standard for age discrimination by establishing an unlawful employment practice when the complaining party demonstrates that age or participation in an investigation, proceeding, or litigation related to an age discrimination claim was a motivating factor for an adverse practice, even though other factors also motivated the practice (thereby allowing what are commonly known as mixed motive claims).

The bill (1) permits the complaining party to rely on any type or form of admissible evidence, which need only be sufficient for a reasonable trier of fact to find that an unlawful practice occurred; and (2) declares that the complaining party shall not be required to demonstrate that age or retaliation was the sole cause of the employment practice (thereby rejecting the Supreme Court's decision in Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc., which requires the complainant to prove that age was the but-for cause for the employer's decision).

The bill applies this evidentiary standard to other employment discrimination and retaliation claims, including claims under the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.

In a claim in which age discrimination is shown, but where the employer demonstrates that it would have taken the same action absent the motivating factor of age, the bill authorizes courts to grant declaratory and injunctive relief, but prohibits the court from awarding damages or issuing an order requiring any admission, reinstatement, hiring, promotion, or payment. This limitation also applies to claims of discrimination based on disability.

The bill also includes reporting requirements for the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the Department of Labor.

Sponsor and cosponsors

Cosponsors by party as of the day they signed on. Original cosponsors signed on the day of introduction.

Democrats · 98

Republicans · 14

Roll calls

Recorded votes on the measure. Most measures move by voice vote or unanimous consent, which record no individual positions.

  1. Jun 23, 2021· House· Amendments· Agreed to 231–192
  2. Jun 23, 2021· House· Amendments· Failed 182–243
  3. Jun 23, 2021· House· Passage· Passed 247–178

History

Every action as published, oldest first. Roll calls link to how each member voted.

  1. Mar 18, 2021Introduced in House
  2. Mar 18, 2021Introduced in House
  3. Mar 18, 2021 · HouseReferred to the House Committee on Education and Labor.
  4. May 26, 2021 · HouseCommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
  5. May 26, 2021 · HouseOrdered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 29 - 18.
  6. Jun 17, 2021Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Education and Labor. H. Rept. 117-63.
  7. Jun 17, 2021 · HouseReported (Amended) by the Committee on Education and Labor. H. Rept. 117-63.
  8. Jun 17, 2021 · HousePlaced on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 44.
  9. Jun 22, 2021 · HouseRules Committee Resolution H. Res. 486 Reported to House. The resolution provides for 1 hour of debate, orders the previous question, and allows a motion to recommit for each measure. Provides that H. Res. 485 is adopted. Provides that anytime through the legislative day of June 25, 2021, the Speaker may entertain motions offered by the Majority Leader or his designee that the House suspend the rules with respect to multiple measures that were the object of motions to suspend the rules on the legislative days of June 22 or 23, and on which the yeas and nays were ordered and further proceedings postponed.
  10. Jun 23, 2021 · HouseConsidered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 486. (consideration: CR H3052-3067; text: CR H3052-3053)
  11. Jun 23, 2021 · HouseThe resolution provides for 1 hour of debate, orders the previous question, and allows a motion to recommit for each measure. Provides that H. Res. 485 is adopted. Provides that anytime through the legislative day of June 25, 2021, the Speaker may entertain motions offered by the Majority Leader or his designee that the House suspend the rules with respect to multiple measures that were the object of motions to suspend the rules on the legislative days of June 22 or 23, and on which the yeas and nays were ordered and further proceedings postponed.
  12. Jun 23, 2021 · HouseDEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 2062.
  13. Jun 23, 2021 · HouseDEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res 486, the House proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the Scott (VA) amendment en bloc No. 1.
  14. Jun 23, 2021 · HousePOSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Scott (VA) amendment en bloc No. 1, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mrs. Foxx demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
  15. Jun 23, 2021 · HouseDEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res 486, the House proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the Scott (VA) amendment en bloc No. 2.
  16. Jun 23, 2021 · HousePOSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Scott (VA) amendment en bloc No. 2, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mrs. Foxx demanded the yeas and nays an d the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
  17. Jun 23, 2021 · HouseDEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res 486, the House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Davis (IL) amendment.
  18. Jun 23, 2021 · HouseUNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was the question on the Scott amendment en bloc No. 1 which had been debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postponed.
  19. Jun 23, 2021 · HouseMotion to reconsider laid on the table. Agreed to without objection.
  20. Jun 23, 2021 · HouseMotion to reconsider laid on the table. Agreed to without objection.
  21. Jun 23, 2021 · HouseThe previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
  22. Jun 23, 2021Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 247 - 178 (Roll no. 180).House · Roll call 180
  23. Jun 23, 2021 · HouseOn passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 247 - 178 (Roll no. 180).House · Roll call 180
  24. Jun 23, 2021 · HouseMotion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  25. Jun 24, 2021 · SenateReceived in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

Committees

Committees and subcommittees the measure was referred to.

Agencies in its committees' jurisdiction

Analisa's mapping of committee jurisdiction to federal agencies; the bill may touch others, or none of these.

Sources and method

Every figure on this page traces to these records.

  • Bill status: bills and resolutions, sponsors, actions, subjects and CRS summaries (U.S. Government Publishing Office (GovInfo), from Congress.gov (Library of Congress))GovInfo Bill Status bulk data (Congress.gov; summaries by the Congressional Research Service) · data current to Oct 6, 2026 · loaded Oct 6, 2026 · license: Public domain (U.S. Government work, 17 U.S.C. § 105)
  • Members of Congress, their terms, committees and identifiers (The @unitedstates project (from the Biographical Directory of the U.S. Congress, the House and the Senate))unitedstates/congress-legislators: legislators, committees and current committee membership · data current to Oct 3, 2026 · loaded Oct 3, 2026 · license: CC0 1.0 (public domain dedication)
  • House roll-call votes (Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives)Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives, roll-call vote records · data current to Oct 3, 2026 · loaded Oct 3, 2026 · license: Public domain (U.S. Government work, 17 U.S.C. § 105)
  • Senate roll-call votes and DW-NOMINATE scores (Voteview (UCLA Department of Political Science))Lewis, Jeffrey B., Keith Poole, Howard Rosenthal, Adam Boche, Aaron Rudkin, and Luke Sonnet (2026). Voteview: Congressional Roll-Call Votes Database. https://voteview.com/ · data current to Oct 3, 2026 · loaded Oct 3, 2026 · license: Free to use with the required citation
  • Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives)Clerk of the House, Lobbying Disclosure Act filings (organizations only; lobbyists' names are not loaded) · data current to Oct 6, 2026 · loaded Oct 6, 2026 · license: Public domain (U.S. Government work, 17 U.S.C. § 105)
  • Positions are shown only where a roll call recorded them; voice votes and unanimous consent record none.