Representative · Connecticut's 3rd district

Rosa L. DeLauro

Rosa L. DeLauro is a Democratic representative for Connecticut's 3rd district, in Congress since 1991. In the 119th Congress, 675 roll calls were held while they served; they missed 7, and cast 461 of 467 party-unity votes with the majority of their caucus.

Party
Democrat
Chamber
House
Current
In Congress since
Jan 3, 1991
Term ends
Jan 3, 2027
Photo: Government Publishing Office (public domain)

Record by Congress

Counts with their denominators for each Congress and chamber served. Ranks are among members who served most of that Congress (100 or more roll calls): rank 1 did it most often. A description, not a grade.

CongressRoll callsMissedVotes with partySponsoredCosponsored across the aisle
119th CongressHouse of Representatives6751.0%7 of 675 · rank 316 of 43999%461 of 467 · rank 173 of 439390 became law16%37 of 237
118th CongressHouse of Representatives1,2221.6%19 of 1,222 · rank 281 of 44299%827 of 839 · rank 155 of 442450 became law12%24 of 204
117th CongressHouse of Representatives9970.7%7 of 997 · rank 276 of 44398%561 of 572 · rank 215 of 443586 became law5%12 of 240

Ideology (DW-NOMINATE)

Voteview's DW-NOMINATE first dimension estimates where members sit from all their roll calls: liberal (−1) to conservative (+1). It describes voting patterns, not views. Shown for the 119th Congress (House), with each party's median and the chamber's range.

Liberal −1−0.41+1 Conservative

Source: Lewis, Jeffrey B., Keith Poole, Howard Rosenthal, Adam Boche, Aaron Rudkin, and Luke Sonnet (2026). Voteview: Congressional Roll-Call Votes Database. https://voteview.com/

Votes against their party

The latest party-unity votes on bills and amendments where the member voted yea or nay against most of their caucus.

  1. Jul 15, 2026· House· Amendments· On Agreeing to the Amendment· Failed 104–314· Against party
  2. May 14, 2026· House· Passage· On Passage· Passed 308–116· Against party
  3. Feb 3, 2026· House· Passage· On Motion to Concur in the Senate Amendments· Passed 217–214· Against party
  4. Feb 13, 2025· House· Passage· On Passage· Passed 264–155· Against party
  5. Feb 6, 2025· House· Passage· On Passage· Passed 312–108· Against party
  6. Dec 11, 2024· House· Passage· On Motion to Concur in the Senate Amendment with an Amendment· Passed 281–140· Against party
  7. Jun 27, 2024· House· Amendments· On Agreeing to the Amendment· Failed 161–251· Against party
  8. Apr 15, 2024· House· Passage· On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended· Passed 294–105· Against party

Recent votes

The latest roll calls on bills and amendments, with the member's recorded position.

  1. Sep 16, 2026· House· Passage· On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass· Passed 401–14
  2. Sep 16, 2026· House· Passage· On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended· Passed 415–9
  3. Sep 16, 2026· House· Passage· On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended· Passed 417–3
  4. Sep 16, 2026· House· Passage· On Passage· Passed 214–208
  5. Sep 16, 2026· House· Passage· On Passage· Passed 217–207
  6. Sep 16, 2026· House· Passage· On Passage· Passed 352–72
  7. Sep 16, 2026· House· Passage· On Motion to Concur in the Senate Amendments· Passed 262–159
  8. Sep 15, 2026· House· Passage· On Agreeing to the Resolution· Passed 220–204
  9. Sep 15, 2026· House· Passage· On Passage· Passed 216–211
  10. Sep 15, 2026· House· Passage· On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended· Passed 408–17
  11. Sep 15, 2026· House· Passage· On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass· Passed 343–79
  12. Sep 15, 2026· House· Passage· On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended· Passed 424–0

Sponsored bills

Bills and resolutions the member introduced as sponsor in the loaded Congresses. Volume is not quality: most measures never leave committee.

142 sponsored · 6 became law

How far they got

  1. Introduced12689%
  2. Reported by committee21.4%
  3. Passed one chamber64.2%
  4. Passed both chambers21.4%
  5. Became law64.2%

Policy areas

  1. Health42
  2. Labor and Employment22
  3. Economics and Public Finance11
  4. Agriculture and Food9
  5. Education8
  6. Government Operations and Politics7
  7. Taxation7
  8. Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues5

Committees

Seats as published by the congress-legislators project. Past seats are those no longer listed since Analisa began recording them.

Federal contracts in the district

Contract obligations attributed to Connecticut's 3rd district by each action's county and its award's ZIP code (land shares through census tracts); an estimate where ZIP codes cross district lines. Shown next to the member's record: neither explains the other.

Obligations · FY2026
$3.2B
Per resident
$4,411
Rank in Connecticut
3 of 5
Contract actions
19.6K
New awards: 16.8K

By fiscal year

  1. 1BFY2017
  2. 990.8MFY2018
  3. 1.1BFY2019
  4. 2.1BFY2020
  5. 862.3MFY2021
  6. 907.9MFY2022
  7. 2.5BFY2023
  8. 2.3BFY2024
  9. 5.3BFY2025
  10. 3.2BFY2026

Top buyers

  1. Department of Defense
  2. Department of Defense
  3. Department of Defense
  4. Department of Defense
  5. Department of Homeland Security
  6. Department of Justice
  7. Department of Health and Human Services

Top recipients

  1. 12,195 awards
  2. 39 awards
  3. RTX CORPORATION$30.5M1.0%
    368 awards
  4. BRICAN, INC.$27.2M0.9%
    4 awards
  5. 1 award
  6. 6 awards
  7. 56 awards
  8. YALE UNIV$11M0.3%
    62 awards
  9. 1 award
  10. 4 awards
Open the district page

Campaign money

What the member's campaigns reported receiving, per FEC two-year cycle, and the federal contracts of the organizations that sponsor the giving PACs (each sponsor matched to a contract recipient by AI, with its probability). Comparisons of public records: neither explains the other.

2026 cycle

Raised
$1.2M
through Jun 30, 2026
Cash on hand
$349.4K
From committees
$625.5K
160 committees
From contractor PACs
$170.7K
42 PACs · 27% of committee money
IndividualsPACsPartySelf

Largest gifts from PACs of federal contractors, 2026

PAC sponsorGivenMatched contract recipientIts contracts, FY2026
general dynamics corporationgeneral dynamics corporation political action committee (general dynamics employee pac)$10KGENERAL DYNAMICS-OTS, INC.AI match · 100% · of one corporate family$29.3K
northrop grumman corporationemployees of northrop grumman corporation pac$10KNORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATIONAI match · 100% · of one corporate family$1.1B
rtx corporationemployees of rtx corporation political action committee$10KRTX CORPORATIONAI match · 100% · the same organization$3.9B
general atomicsgeneral atomics political action committee$10KGENERAL ATOMICSAI match · 95% · the same organization—
leidos, inc.leidos inc. political action committee$10KLEIDOS, INC.AI match · 99% · the same organization$1.1B
l3harris technologies, inc.l3harris technologies, inc. pac$9,000L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.AI match · 100% · the same organization$115.4M
the boeing companythe boeing company pac$8,500THE BOEING COMPANYAI match · 99% · the same organization$9B
peraton corp.peraton corp. political action committee (a.k.a. 'peraton pac')$8,000PERATON INC.AI match · 99% · the same organization-$756.1K
honeywell internationalhoneywell international inc. technologies public affairs council (honpac)$6,500HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.AI match · 100% · the same organization$260.5M
american dental associationamerican dental association political action committee$5,000AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATIONAI match · 98% · the same organization$78.5K

By cycle

CycleRaised (FEC summary)From committeesFrom contractor PACs
2026$1.2M$625.5K$170.7K42 PACs · 27% of committee money
2024$1.8M$860.7K$236.7K58 PACs · 28% of committee money
2022$2.2M$886.2K$217.1K52 PACs · 24% of committee money

Raised is the FEC's cumulative summary of the candidacy; committee money counts each contribution reported, so the two cover slightly different dates.

Terms

Every term in the House or Senate, as published by the congress-legislators project.

  1. House · Connecticut's 3rd districtJan 3, 2025 – Jan 3, 2027
  2. House · Connecticut's 3rd districtJan 3, 2023 – Jan 3, 2025
  3. House · Connecticut's 3rd districtJan 3, 2021 – Jan 3, 2023
  4. House · Connecticut's 3rd districtJan 3, 2019 – Jan 3, 2021
  5. House · Connecticut's 3rd districtJan 3, 2017 – Jan 3, 2019
  6. House · Connecticut's 3rd districtJan 6, 2015 – Jan 3, 2017
  7. House · Connecticut's 3rd districtJan 3, 2013 – Jan 3, 2015
  8. House · Connecticut's 3rd districtJan 5, 2011 – Jan 3, 2013
  9. House · Connecticut's 3rd districtJan 6, 2009 – Jan 3, 2011
  10. House · Connecticut's 3rd districtJan 4, 2007 – Jan 3, 2009
  11. House · Connecticut's 3rd districtJan 4, 2005 – Jan 3, 2007
  12. House · Connecticut's 3rd districtJan 7, 2003 – Jan 3, 2005
  13. House · Connecticut's 3rd districtJan 3, 2001 – Jan 3, 2003
  14. House · Connecticut's 3rd districtJan 6, 1999 – Jan 3, 2001
  15. House · Connecticut's 3rd districtJan 7, 1997 – Jan 3, 1999
  16. House · Connecticut's 3rd districtJan 4, 1995 – Jan 3, 1997
  17. House · Connecticut's 3rd districtJan 5, 1993 – Jan 3, 1995
  18. House · Connecticut's 3rd districtJan 3, 1991 – Jan 3, 1993

Contact

Official channels, as published.

Office
2413 Rayburn House Office Building

Identifiers

The same member in other public records.

Sources and method

Every figure on this page traces to these records.

  • Members of Congress, their terms, committees and identifiers (The @unitedstates project (from the Biographical Directory of the U.S. Congress, the House and the Senate))unitedstates/congress-legislators: legislators, committees and current committee membership · data current to Oct 3, 2026 · loaded Oct 3, 2026 · license: CC0 1.0 (public domain dedication)
  • House roll-call votes (Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives)Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives, roll-call vote records · data current to Oct 3, 2026 · loaded Oct 3, 2026 · license: Public domain (U.S. Government work, 17 U.S.C. § 105)
  • Senate roll-call votes and DW-NOMINATE scores (Voteview (UCLA Department of Political Science))Lewis, Jeffrey B., Keith Poole, Howard Rosenthal, Adam Boche, Aaron Rudkin, and Luke Sonnet (2026). Voteview: Congressional Roll-Call Votes Database. https://voteview.com/ · data current to Oct 3, 2026 · loaded Oct 3, 2026 · license: Free to use with the required citation
  • Bill status: bills and resolutions, sponsors, actions, subjects and CRS summaries (U.S. Government Publishing Office (GovInfo), from Congress.gov (Library of Congress))GovInfo Bill Status bulk data (Congress.gov; summaries by the Congressional Research Service) · data current to Oct 9, 2026 · loaded Oct 9, 2026 · license: Public domain (U.S. Government work, 17 U.S.C. § 105)
  • Congressional district boundaries and relationship files (U.S. Census Bureau)U.S. Census Bureau, Cartographic Boundary Files (congressional districts) and 2020 relationship files · release cd116+cd118+cd119 · loaded Oct 3, 2026 · license: Public domain (U.S. Government work, 17 U.S.C. § 105)
  • ZIP code (ZCTA) to congressional district crosswalk (U.S. Census Bureau)U.S. Census Bureau, 2020 relationship files (ZCTAs, tracts and congressional districts); shares computed by Analisa · release 2020 · loaded Oct 3, 2026 · license: Public domain (U.S. Government work, 17 U.S.C. § 105)
  • Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov)USAspending.gov, prime award contract transactions (FPDS) · data current to Oct 9, 2026 · loaded Oct 9, 2026 · license: Public domain (U.S. Government work, 17 U.S.C. § 105)
  • Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission)FEC bulk data: committee master, candidate master (candidates' names, no addresses), linkages, PAC summaries, all-candidates summaries and contributions from committees (no individual contributors) · data current to Oct 9, 2026 · loaded Oct 9, 2026 · license: Public domain (U.S. Government work, 17 U.S.C. § 105)
  • Positions are shown only where a roll call recorded them; voice votes and unanimous consent record none.
  • Activity counts describe volume and attendance; they are not a measure of quality.
  • Money and votes are shown side by side; neither explains the other.