H.R. 4288 · 118th Congress

Agricultural Labeling Uniformity Act

Introduced on Jun 22, 2023 by Dusty Johnson (R-SD). 7 cosponsors, 4 of them from another party. Latest action (Aug 21, 2023): Referred to the Subcommittee on Conservation, Research, and Biotechnology.

Stage
Introduced
Introduced
Jun 22, 2023
Cosponsors
7
4 from the other party
Policy area
Environmental Protection

Progress

The furthest stage the measure reached. Simple and concurrent resolutions do not go to the President.

  1. Introduced
  2. 2Reported by committee
  3. 3Passed one chamber
  4. 4Passed both chambers
  5. 5Sent to the President
  6. 6Became law

Official title

To clarify the application of a certain provision of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act with respect to the uniformity of pesticide labeling, consistent with the text of such Act, and for other purposes.

Subjects

  • Consumer affairs
  • Environmental regulatory procedures
  • Federal preemption
  • Hazardous wastes and toxic substances
  • Pest management
  • State and local government operations

Summary

The Congressional Research Service has not summarized this measure yet.

Sponsor and cosponsors

Cosponsors by party as of the day they signed on. Original cosponsors signed on the day of introduction.

Dusty JohnsonR-SDSponsor

Democrats · 4

Republicans · 3

Roll calls

Recorded votes on the measure. Most measures move by voice vote or unanimous consent, which record no individual positions.

No recorded roll call on this measure: it moved by voice vote or unanimous consent, or has not reached the floor.

History

Every action as published, oldest first. Roll calls link to how each member voted.

  1. Jun 22, 2023Introduced in House
  2. Jun 22, 2023Introduced in House
  3. Jun 22, 2023 · HouseReferred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
  4. Aug 21, 2023 · HouseReferred to the Subcommittee on Conservation, Research, and Biotechnology.

Committees

Committees and subcommittees the measure was referred to.

Agencies in its committees' jurisdiction

Analisa's mapping of committee jurisdiction to federal agencies; the bill may touch others, or none of these.

Who lobbied on it

Organizations whose lobbying reports (LD-2) name this measure. Spending is what they reported for those quarters on all issues, not on this measure alone.

  1. AMERICAN SUGAR ALLIANCE16 reports
    $4.4M reported (all issues)
  2. NATIONAL POTATO COUNCIL11 reports
    $782.5K reported (all issues)
  3. Environmental Working Group6 reports
  4. AGRICULTURAL RETAILERS ASSOCIATION5 reports
    $910K reported (all issues)
  5. AMERICAN BIRD CONSERVANCY5 reports
    $187.5K reported (all issues)
  6. AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FED5 reports
    $1.6M reported (all issues)
  7. American Association for Justice5 reports
    $6.3M reported (all issues)
  8. Bayer Corporation5 reports
    $400K reported (all issues)Federal contractor: BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC$1.4M in contracts, FY2026AI match · 100%
  9. Bayer Corporation (consolidated report)5 reports
    $10.7M reported (all issues)
  10. Bayer U.S. LLC5 reports
    $300K reported (all issues)
  11. CROPLIFE AMERICA5 reports
    $1.7M reported (all issues)
  12. Chamber of Commerce of the U.S.A.5 reports
    $93.5M reported (all issues)
  13. Farmers Educational Cooperative Union of America5 reports
    $400K reported (all issues)
  14. Michigan Farm Bureau5 reports
    $270K reported (all issues)
  15. Midwest Council on Agriculture5 reports
    $187.5K reported (all issues)
  16. PENNSYLVANIA FARM BUREAU5 reports
    $70K reported (all issues)
  17. American Horticulture Industry Association4 reports
    $80K reported (all issues)
  18. SOUTHWEST COUNCIL OF AGRIBUSINESS3 reports
    $95K reported (all issues)
  19. MINNESOTA CORN GROWERS2 reports
    $80K reported (all issues)
  20. MINNESOTA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION2 reports
    $20K reported (all issues)
  21. NATIONAL SORGHUM PRODUCERS2 reports
    $80K reported (all issues)
  22. USA RICE FEDERATION2 reports
  23. WESTERN PEANUT GROWERS ASSOCIATION, INC.2 reports
    $20K reported (all issues)
  24. CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY1 report
    $105.7K reported (all issues)
  25. Earthjustice1 report
    $169.1K reported (all issues)
  26. Illinois Agricultural Association1 report
    $30K reported (all issues)

Reports filed in 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026.

Sources and method

Every figure on this page traces to these records.

  • Bill status: bills and resolutions, sponsors, actions, subjects and CRS summaries (U.S. Government Publishing Office (GovInfo), from Congress.gov (Library of Congress))GovInfo Bill Status bulk data (Congress.gov; summaries by the Congressional Research Service) · data current to Oct 9, 2026 · loaded Oct 9, 2026 · license: Public domain (U.S. Government work, 17 U.S.C. § 105)
  • Members of Congress, their terms, committees and identifiers (The @unitedstates project (from the Biographical Directory of the U.S. Congress, the House and the Senate))unitedstates/congress-legislators: legislators, committees and current committee membership · data current to Oct 3, 2026 · loaded Oct 3, 2026 · license: CC0 1.0 (public domain dedication)
  • House roll-call votes (Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives)Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives, roll-call vote records · data current to Oct 3, 2026 · loaded Oct 3, 2026 · license: Public domain (U.S. Government work, 17 U.S.C. § 105)
  • Senate roll-call votes and DW-NOMINATE scores (Voteview (UCLA Department of Political Science))Lewis, Jeffrey B., Keith Poole, Howard Rosenthal, Adam Boche, Aaron Rudkin, and Luke Sonnet (2026). Voteview: Congressional Roll-Call Votes Database. https://voteview.com/ · data current to Oct 3, 2026 · loaded Oct 3, 2026 · license: Free to use with the required citation
  • Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives)Clerk of the House, Lobbying Disclosure Act filings (organizations only; lobbyists' names are not loaded) · data current to Oct 9, 2026 · loaded Oct 9, 2026 · license: Public domain (U.S. Government work, 17 U.S.C. § 105)
  • Positions are shown only where a roll call recorded them; voice votes and unanimous consent record none.
  • Money and votes are shown side by side; neither explains the other.