Representative · South Dakota (at large)

Dusty Johnson

Dusty Johnson is a Republican representative for South Dakota (at large), in Congress since 2019. In the 119th Congress, 675 roll calls were held while they served; they missed 32, and cast 452 of 456 party-unity votes with the majority of their caucus.

Party
Republican
Chamber
House
Current
In Congress since
Jan 3, 2019
Term ends
Jan 3, 2027
Photo: Government Publishing Office (public domain)

Record by Congress

Counts with their denominators for each Congress and chamber served. Ranks are among members who served most of that Congress (100 or more roll calls): rank 1 did it most often. A description, not a grade.

CongressRoll callsMissedVotes with partySponsoredCosponsored across the aisle
119th CongressHouse of Representatives6754.7%32 of 675 · rank 81 of 43999%452 of 456 · rank 132 of 439391 became law14%20 of 139
118th CongressHouse of Representatives1,2220.9%11 of 1,222 · rank 345 of 44296%817 of 847 · rank 251 of 442330 became law15%32 of 209
117th CongressHouse of Representatives9970.6%6 of 997 · rank 294 of 44395%539 of 570 · rank 368 of 443360 became law31%70 of 228

Ideology (DW-NOMINATE)

Voteview's DW-NOMINATE first dimension estimates where members sit from all their roll calls: liberal (−1) to conservative (+1). It describes voting patterns, not views. Shown for the 119th Congress (House), with each party's median and the chamber's range.

Liberal −1+0.47+1 Conservative

Source: Lewis, Jeffrey B., Keith Poole, Howard Rosenthal, Adam Boche, Aaron Rudkin, and Luke Sonnet (2026). Voteview: Congressional Roll-Call Votes Database. https://voteview.com/

Votes against their party

The latest party-unity votes on bills and amendments where the member voted yea or nay against most of their caucus.

  1. Jul 15, 2026· House· Amendments· On Agreeing to the Amendment· Failed 136–291· Against party
  2. Jan 14, 2026· House· Amendments· On Agreeing to the Amendment· Failed 127–291· Against party
  3. Jan 14, 2026· House· Amendments· On Agreeing to the Amendment· Failed 163–257· Against party
  4. Sep 4, 2025· House· Amendments· On Agreeing to the Amendment· Failed 127–297· Against party
  5. Jul 23, 2024· House· Amendments· On Agreeing to the Amendment· Failed 147–269· Against party
  6. Jul 11, 2024· House· Amendments· On Agreeing to the Amendment· Failed 128–289· Against party
  7. Jul 11, 2024· House· Amendments· On Agreeing to the Amendment· Failed 149–262· Against party
  8. Jun 27, 2024· House· Amendments· On Agreeing to the Amendment· Failed 149–259· Against party

Recent votes

The latest roll calls on bills and amendments, with the member's recorded position.

  1. Sep 16, 2026· House· Passage· On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass· Passed 401–14
  2. Sep 16, 2026· House· Passage· On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended· Passed 415–9· Against party
  3. Sep 16, 2026· House· Passage· On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended· Passed 417–3
  4. Sep 16, 2026· House· Passage· On Passage· Passed 214–208
  5. Sep 16, 2026· House· Passage· On Passage· Passed 217–207
  6. Sep 16, 2026· House· Passage· On Passage· Passed 352–72
  7. Sep 16, 2026· House· Passage· On Motion to Concur in the Senate Amendments· Passed 262–159
  8. Sep 15, 2026· House· Passage· On Agreeing to the Resolution· Passed 220–204
  9. Sep 15, 2026· House· Passage· On Passage· Passed 216–211
  10. Sep 15, 2026· House· Passage· On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended· Passed 408–17
  11. Sep 15, 2026· House· Passage· On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass· Passed 343–79
  12. Sep 15, 2026· House· Passage· On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended· Passed 424–0

Sponsored bills

Bills and resolutions the member introduced as sponsor in the loaded Congresses. Volume is not quality: most measures never leave committee.

108 sponsored · 1 became law

How far they got

  1. Introduced9790%
  2. Reported by committee43.7%
  3. Passed one chamber65.6%
  4. Became law10.9%

Policy areas

  1. Native Americans18
  2. Transportation and Public Works15
  3. Agriculture and Food14
  4. Crime and Law Enforcement6
  5. Government Operations and Politics6
  6. Public Lands and Natural Resources6
  7. Environmental Protection5
  8. Labor and Employment5

Latest activity

  1. H.R. 9785 South Dakota Water Feasibility Studies Act
    Introduced· Water Resources Development· Sep 15, 2026
  2. H.R. 10190 Pennington County Land Conveyance Act
    Introduced· Public Lands and Natural Resources· Aug 31, 2026
  3. H.R. 7331 Dakota Mainstem Water Supply Project Feasibility Study Act
    Introduced· Water Resources Development· Apr 29, 2026
  4. H.R. 7287 Lewis and Clark Regional Water System Expansion Feasibility Study Act
    Introduced· Water Resources Development· Apr 29, 2026
  5. H.R. 7288 Western South Dakota Water Supply Project Feasibility Study Act
    Introduced· Water Resources Development· Apr 16, 2026
  6. H.R. 8104 Fertilizer Transparency Act of 2026
    Introduced· Agriculture and Food· Mar 26, 2026
  7. H.R. 7699 Tribal Police Department Parity Act
    Introduced· Native Americans· Feb 25, 2026
  8. H.R. 7698 Tribal Firearm Access Act
    Introduced· Native Americans· Feb 25, 2026

Committees

Seats as published by the congress-legislators project. Past seats are those no longer listed since Analisa began recording them.

Federal contracts in the district

Contract obligations attributed to South Dakota (at large) by each action's county and its award's ZIP code (land shares through census tracts); an estimate where ZIP codes cross district lines. Shown next to the member's record: neither explains the other.

Obligations · FY2026
$710.5M
Per resident
$783
Rank in South Dakota
—
Contract actions
4,451
New awards: 2,147

By fiscal year

  1. 711.5MFY2017
  2. 765.2MFY2018
  3. 941.1MFY2019
  4. 979MFY2020
  5. 623.6MFY2021
  6. 1.2BFY2022
  7. 1BFY2023
  8. 1.3BFY2024
  9. 804.3MFY2025
  10. 710.5MFY2026

Top buyers

  1. Department of Defense
  2. Department of Health and Human Services
  3. Department of the Interior
  4. Department of Defense
  5. Department of Defense
  6. Forest Service$17.3M2.4%
    Department of Agriculture
  7. Department of the Interior

Top recipients

  1. 53 awards
  2. 196 awards
  3. 7 awards
  4. 6 awards
  5. 14 awards
  6. 1 award
  7. 16 awards
  8. 1 award
  9. 50 awards
  10. 6 awards
Open the district page

Campaign money

What the member's campaigns reported receiving, per FEC two-year cycle, and the federal contracts of the organizations that sponsor the giving PACs (each sponsor matched to a contract recipient by AI, with its probability). Comparisons of public records: neither explains the other.

2026 cycle

Raised
$1.7M
through Jun 30, 2026
Cash on hand
$1.4M
From committees
$325.5K
154 committees
From contractor PACs
$68.5K
32 PACs · 21% of committee money
IndividualsPACsPartySelf

Largest gifts from PACs of federal contractors, 2026

PAC sponsorGivenMatched contract recipientIts contracts, FY2026
american hospital associationamerican hospital association pac$10KAMERICAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATIONAI match · 99% · the same organization$1.2M
nutrien ag solutionsnutrien ag solutions employee citizenship fund political action committee ('nutrien citizenship fund pac')$5,000NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS, INC.AI match · 100% · the same organization$23.9K
bunge north america incbunge north america inc political action committee$5,000BUNGE NORTH AMERICA, INCAI match · 100% · the same organization-$534
american bankers association (aba)american bankers association pac (bankpac)$2,500AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATIONAI match · 100% · the same organization—
mortgage bankers associationmortgage bankers association political action committee (morpac)$2,500MORTGAGE BANKERS ASSOCIATIONAI match · 100% · the same organization$125K
international paperinternational paper political action committee (ip-pac)$2,500INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANYAI match · 100% · the same organization—
pepsico, inc.pepsico, inc. concerned citizens fund$2,500PEPSICO BEVERAGE SALES, LLCAI match · 91% · of one corporate family$3.4M
northrop grumman corporationemployees of northrop grumman corporation pac$2,500NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATIONAI match · 100% · of one corporate family$1.1B
chs inc.chs inc. political action committee$2,500CHS INC.AI match · 100% · the same organization$76.7M
deere & companydeere & company pac (aka john deere pac)$2,500DEERE & COMPANYAI match · 99% · the same organization$10.2M

By cycle

CycleRaised (FEC summary)From committeesFrom contractor PACs
2026$1.7M$325.5K$68.5K32 PACs · 21% of committee money
2024$4.4M$1.3M$222K64 PACs · 17% of committee money
2022$2.6M$902.3K$199.5K51 PACs · 22% of committee money

Raised is the FEC's cumulative summary of the candidacy; committee money counts each contribution reported, so the two cover slightly different dates.

Terms

Every term in the House or Senate, as published by the congress-legislators project.

  1. House · South Dakota (at large)Jan 3, 2025 – Jan 3, 2027
  2. House · South Dakota (at large)Jan 3, 2023 – Jan 3, 2025
  3. House · South Dakota (at large)Jan 3, 2021 – Jan 3, 2023
  4. House · South Dakota (at large)Jan 3, 2019 – Jan 3, 2021

Contact

Official channels, as published.

Office
1714 Longworth House Office Building

Identifiers

The same member in other public records.

Sources and method

Every figure on this page traces to these records.

  • Members of Congress, their terms, committees and identifiers (The @unitedstates project (from the Biographical Directory of the U.S. Congress, the House and the Senate))unitedstates/congress-legislators: legislators, committees and current committee membership · data current to Oct 3, 2026 · loaded Oct 3, 2026 · license: CC0 1.0 (public domain dedication)
  • House roll-call votes (Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives)Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives, roll-call vote records · data current to Oct 3, 2026 · loaded Oct 3, 2026 · license: Public domain (U.S. Government work, 17 U.S.C. § 105)
  • Senate roll-call votes and DW-NOMINATE scores (Voteview (UCLA Department of Political Science))Lewis, Jeffrey B., Keith Poole, Howard Rosenthal, Adam Boche, Aaron Rudkin, and Luke Sonnet (2026). Voteview: Congressional Roll-Call Votes Database. https://voteview.com/ · data current to Oct 3, 2026 · loaded Oct 3, 2026 · license: Free to use with the required citation
  • Bill status: bills and resolutions, sponsors, actions, subjects and CRS summaries (U.S. Government Publishing Office (GovInfo), from Congress.gov (Library of Congress))GovInfo Bill Status bulk data (Congress.gov; summaries by the Congressional Research Service) · data current to Oct 9, 2026 · loaded Oct 9, 2026 · license: Public domain (U.S. Government work, 17 U.S.C. § 105)
  • Congressional district boundaries and relationship files (U.S. Census Bureau)U.S. Census Bureau, Cartographic Boundary Files (congressional districts) and 2020 relationship files · release cd116+cd118+cd119 · loaded Oct 3, 2026 · license: Public domain (U.S. Government work, 17 U.S.C. § 105)
  • ZIP code (ZCTA) to congressional district crosswalk (U.S. Census Bureau)U.S. Census Bureau, 2020 relationship files (ZCTAs, tracts and congressional districts); shares computed by Analisa · release 2020 · loaded Oct 3, 2026 · license: Public domain (U.S. Government work, 17 U.S.C. § 105)
  • Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov)USAspending.gov, prime award contract transactions (FPDS) · data current to Oct 9, 2026 · loaded Oct 9, 2026 · license: Public domain (U.S. Government work, 17 U.S.C. § 105)
  • Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission)FEC bulk data: committee master, candidate master (candidates' names, no addresses), linkages, PAC summaries, all-candidates summaries and contributions from committees (no individual contributors) · data current to Oct 9, 2026 · loaded Oct 9, 2026 · license: Public domain (U.S. Government work, 17 U.S.C. § 105)
  • Positions are shown only where a roll call recorded them; voice votes and unanimous consent record none.
  • Activity counts describe volume and attendance; they are not a measure of quality.
  • Money and votes are shown side by side; neither explains the other.