H.R. 1534 · 119th Congress

IMPACT Act

Introduced on Feb 24, 2025 by Max L. Miller (R-OH-7). One cosponsor. Latest action (Mar 26, 2025): Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

Stage
Passed one chamber
Introduced
Feb 24, 2025
Cosponsors
1
1 from the other party
Policy area
Science, Technology, Communications
Open in the Congress explorerCongress.govAlert me

Progress

The furthest stage the measure reached. Simple and concurrent resolutions do not go to the President.

  1. Introduced
  2. Reported by committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. 4Passed both chambers
  5. 5Sent to the President
  6. 6Became law

Official title

To strengthen and enhance the competitiveness of American industry through the research and development of advanced technologies to improve the efficiency of cement, concrete, and asphalt production, and for other purposes.

Subjects

  • Advanced technology and technological innovations
  • Air quality
  • Climate change and greenhouse gases
  • Infrastructure development
  • Research and development
  • Rural conditions and development

Summary

By the Congressional Research Service (Introduced in House, Feb 24, 2025). Public domain.

Innovative Mitigation Partnerships for Asphalt and Concrete Technologies Act or the IMPACT Act

This bill requires the Department of Energy (DOE) to establish a temporary program that supports advanced production of low-emissions cement, concrete, and asphalt.

Specifically, the program must support research, development, and commercial application of production processes for low-emissions cement, concrete, and asphalt that are more cost-effective, durable, or resource-efficient (i.e., advanced production). The program must particularly focus on carbon capture technologies, energy-efficient processes, research involving novel materials, and other specified technologies and innovative processes.

DOE must select entities to implement relevant demonstration projects; eligible entities include government, nonprofit, educational, and private sector entities. DOE may terminate these projects if it determines that sufficient amounts of low-emissions cement, concrete, and asphalt that are produced through advanced production are commercially available at reasonable prices.

The program terminates seven years after the bill is enacted.

Sponsor and cosponsors

Cosponsors by party as of the day they signed on. Original cosponsors signed on the day of introduction.

Max L. MillerR-OH-7Sponsor

Democrats · 1

Roll calls

Recorded votes on the measure. Most measures move by voice vote or unanimous consent, which record no individual positions.

  1. On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass
    Mar 25, 2025· House· Passage· Passed 350–73

History

Every action as published, oldest first. Roll calls link to how each member voted.

  1. Feb 24, 2025Introduced in House
  2. Feb 24, 2025Introduced in House
  3. Feb 24, 2025 · HouseReferred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
  4. Mar 24, 2025 · HouseMr. Babin moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.
  5. Mar 24, 2025 · HouseConsidered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H1209-1212)
  6. Mar 24, 2025 · HouseDEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 1534.
  7. Mar 24, 2025 · HouseAt the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.
  8. Mar 25, 2025 · HouseConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1239)
  9. Mar 25, 2025Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 350 - 73 (Roll no. 74). (text: 3/24/2025 CR H1209-1211)House · Roll call 74
  10. Mar 25, 2025 · HouseOn motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 350 - 73 (Roll no. 74). (text: 3/24/2025 CR H1209-1211)House · Roll call 74
  11. Mar 25, 2025 · HouseMotion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  12. Mar 26, 2025 · SenateReceived in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

Committees

Committees and subcommittees the measure was referred to.

Agencies in its committees' jurisdiction

Analisa's mapping of committee jurisdiction to federal agencies; the bill may touch others, or none of these.

Who lobbied on it

Organizations whose lobbying reports (LD-2) name this measure. Spending is what they reported for those quarters on all issues, not on this measure alone.

  1. AMRIZE NORTH AMERICA INC.9 reports
    $930K reported (all issues)
  2. NATIONAL READY MIXED CONCRETE ASSOCIATION6 reports
    $430.1K reported (all issues)
  3. PORTLAND CEMENT ASSOCIATION6 reports
    $1.6M reported (all issues)
  4. CALPORTLAND COMPANY5 reports
  5. Sierra Club5 reports
    $520K reported (all issues)
  6. American Cement Association (formerly known as Portland Cement Association)4 reports
    $80K reported (all issues)
  7. Google Client Services LLC4 reports
    $13.4M reported (all issues)
  8. RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY4 reports
    $400K reported (all issues)Federal contractor: RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY$15.3M in contracts, FY2026AI match · 100%
  9. U.S. Tire Manufacturers Association4 reports
    $570K reported (all issues)
  10. Center for Climate and Energy Solutions3 reports
    $110K reported (all issues)
  11. CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBLE ENERGY SOLUTIONS, INC.2 reports
    $720K reported (all issues)
  12. American Cement Association (formally know as Portland Cement Association (PCA))1 report
    $20K reported (all issues)
  13. Amrize North America Inc. FKA HolcimUS1 report
    $70K reported (all issues)
  14. Clean Air Task Force, Inc.1 report
    $80K reported (all issues)
  15. Holcim Participations (US) Inc.1 report
    $450K reported (all issues)
  16. Portland Cement Association (PCA)1 report
    $20K reported (all issues)
  17. VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY1 report

Reports filed in 2025, 2026.

Sources and method

Every figure on this page traces to these records.

  • Bill status: bills and resolutions, sponsors, actions, subjects and CRS summaries (U.S. Government Publishing Office (GovInfo), from Congress.gov (Library of Congress))GovInfo Bill Status bulk data (Congress.gov; summaries by the Congressional Research Service) · data current to Oct 6, 2026 · loaded Oct 6, 2026 · license: Public domain (U.S. Government work, 17 U.S.C. § 105)
  • Members of Congress, their terms, committees and identifiers (The @unitedstates project (from the Biographical Directory of the U.S. Congress, the House and the Senate))unitedstates/congress-legislators: legislators, committees and current committee membership · data current to Oct 3, 2026 · loaded Oct 3, 2026 · license: CC0 1.0 (public domain dedication)
  • House roll-call votes (Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives)Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives, roll-call vote records · data current to Oct 3, 2026 · loaded Oct 3, 2026 · license: Public domain (U.S. Government work, 17 U.S.C. § 105)
  • Senate roll-call votes and DW-NOMINATE scores (Voteview (UCLA Department of Political Science))Lewis, Jeffrey B., Keith Poole, Howard Rosenthal, Adam Boche, Aaron Rudkin, and Luke Sonnet (2026). Voteview: Congressional Roll-Call Votes Database. https://voteview.com/ · data current to Oct 3, 2026 · loaded Oct 3, 2026 · license: Free to use with the required citation
  • Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives)Clerk of the House, Lobbying Disclosure Act filings (organizations only; lobbyists' names are not loaded) · data current to Oct 6, 2026 · loaded Oct 6, 2026 · license: Public domain (U.S. Government work, 17 U.S.C. § 105)
  • Positions are shown only where a roll call recorded them; voice votes and unanimous consent record none.
  • Money and votes are shown side by side; neither explains the other.