Federal contractor · SIERRA VISTA, AZ
3D MANAGEMENT & CONSULTING LLC
3D MANAGEMENT & CONSULTING LLC received $1.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (+2,041% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $7.5M. Its largest customer was Public Buildings Service ($860.9K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $1.2M
- New awards
- 6
- Sole-source
- 5.1%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- KTVJZKJ2WK94
- Parent company
- 3D MANAGEMENT & CONSULTING LLC
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 881.9KFY2017
- 720.6KFY2018
- 918.8KFY2019
- 582KFY2020
- 901.8KFY2021
- 1.2MFY2022
- 520KFY2023
- 536.9KFY2024
- 56.7KFY2025
- 1.2MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Public Buildings Service$860.9K71%1 awards
- Department of Veterans Affairs$302.8K25%2 awards
- Department of the Army$62K5.1%1 awards
- Missile Defense Agency$5000.0%1 awards
- Forest Service-$12.8K0.0%1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Facilities & utilities$1.2M95%
- Professional services$62K5.1%
- Research & development$5000.0%
Where the work was performed
- Santa Cruz County, AZ$848.1K70%
- San Francisco County, CA$182.3K15%
- San Mateo County, CA$120.5K9.9%
- Cochise County, AZ$62K5.1%
- Madison County, AL$5000.0%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition5.1%US 39% · $62K
- Sole-source awards5.1%US 30% · $62K
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.7% · $0
- Urgency justifications5.1%US 5.1% · $62K
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts
- Department of Defense · 1 awards
Largest awards
- Public Buildings Service· Santa Cruz County, AZ· Facilities & utilities· May 26, 2026 – May 26, 2026· 47PG5226F0015
- Department of Veterans Affairs· San Francisco County, CA· Facilities & utilities· Oct 1, 2025 – Aug 7, 2026· 36C26126F0021
- JANITORIAL SERVICES$160.6KDepartment of Veterans Affairs· San Mateo County, CA· Facilities & utilities· May 30, 2025 – Aug 7, 2026· 36C26125F0312
- Department of the Army· Cochise County, AZ· Professional services· Jan 20, 2026 – May 22, 2026· W91RUS26CA004
- Forest Service· Santa Cruz County, AZ· Facilities & utilities· Sep 30, 2020 – Jan 30, 2026· 12837120C0127
- Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Jan 16, 2026 – Jun 9, 2026· HQ085926FF375
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
1 company · $500 reported
- THE SIERRA VISTA DREAM CENTER$500SIERRA VISTA, AZ · 1 subaward
Primes that pay it
No prime reported paying it.
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 7 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- OCCU-TEC INC$944.3K+239% in FY2026KANSAS CITY, MO · 48% of this company's obligations are in markets they both servePublic Buildings Service · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
- RELOCATION STRATEGIES ARIZONA LLC$1.4M−53% in FY2026SCOTTSDALE, AZ · 52% of this company's obligations are in markets they both servePublic Buildings Service · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesVeterans Affairs · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
- PINEAPPLE STRATEGIES, LLC$511.6K−10% in FY2026WILMINGTON, NC · 28% of this company's obligations are in markets they both servePublic Buildings Service · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.