Federal contractor · SIERRA VISTA, AZ

3D MANAGEMENT & CONSULTING LLC

3D MANAGEMENT & CONSULTING LLC received $1.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (+2,041% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $7.5M. Its largest customer was Public Buildings Service ($860.9K).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.2M
New awards
6
Sole-source
5.1%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
KTVJZKJ2WK94
Parent company
3D MANAGEMENT & CONSULTING LLC
Small businessWoman-ownedVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-ownedMinority-owned8(a) program

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 881.9KFY2017
  2. 720.6KFY2018
  3. 918.8KFY2019
  4. 582KFY2020
  5. 901.8KFY2021
  6. 1.2MFY2022
  7. 520KFY2023
  8. 536.9KFY2024
  9. 56.7KFY2025
  10. 1.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 2 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. Forest Service-$12.8K0.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$1.2M95%
  2. Professional services$62K5.1%
  3. Research & development$5000.0%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition5.1%
    US 39% · $62K
  • Sole-source awards5.1%
    US 30% · $62K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications5.1%
    US 5.1% · $62K

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Public Buildings Service· Santa Cruz County, AZ· Facilities & utilities· May 26, 2026 – May 26, 2026· 47PG5226F0015
  2. Department of Veterans Affairs· San Francisco County, CA· Facilities & utilities· Oct 1, 2025 – Aug 7, 2026· 36C26126F0021
  3. Department of Veterans Affairs· San Mateo County, CA· Facilities & utilities· May 30, 2025 – Aug 7, 2026· 36C26125F0312
  4. Department of the Army· Cochise County, AZ· Professional services· Jan 20, 2026 – May 22, 2026· W91RUS26CA004
  5. Forest Service· Santa Cruz County, AZ· Facilities & utilities· Sep 30, 2020 – Jan 30, 2026· 12837120C0127
  6. Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Jan 16, 2026 – Jun 9, 2026· HQ085926FF375

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

1 company · $500 reported

  1. THE SIERRA VISTA DREAM CENTER$500
    SIERRA VISTA, AZ · 1 subaward

Primes that pay it

No prime reported paying it.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 7 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. OCCU-TEC INC$944.3K+239% in FY2026
    KANSAS CITY, MO · 48% of this company's obligations are in markets they both servePublic Buildings Service · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. SCOTTSDALE, AZ · 52% of this company's obligations are in markets they both servePublic Buildings Service · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesVeterans Affairs · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. PINEAPPLE STRATEGIES, LLC$511.6K−10% in FY2026
    WILMINGTON, NC · 28% of this company's obligations are in markets they both servePublic Buildings Service · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.