Federal contractor · SCOTTSDALE, AZ
RELOCATION STRATEGIES ARIZONA LLC
RELOCATION STRATEGIES ARIZONA LLC received $204.1K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (−53% vs FY2025). Since FY2023: $1.7M. Its largest customer was Department of Veterans Affairs ($168.9K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $204.1K
- New awards
- 4
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- FAW8YMFKN5M4
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 271.1KFY2023
- 749.8KFY2024
- 438.4KFY2025
- 204.1KFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of Veterans Affairs$168.9K83%1 awards
- Federal Bureau of Investigation$24.7K12%1 awards
- Bureau of Land Management$10.5K5.1%1 awards
- National Park Service-$0.010.0%1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Professional services$168.9K83%
- Construction & real property$24.7K12%
- Transportation & logistics$10.5K5.1%
Where the work was performed
- Santa Clara County, CA$168.9K83%
- San Diego County, CA$24.7K12%
- Maricopa County, AZ$10.5K5.1%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition0.0%US 39% · $0
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.7% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Department of Veterans Affairs· Santa Clara County, CA· Professional services· Aug 11, 2026 – Aug 11, 2026· 36C26126F0342
- MIB DENSIFICATION$145.3KNational Park Service· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Sep 17, 2024 – Jul 24, 2026· 140P2024F0411
- LECC CLEAN OUT$24.7KFederal Bureau of Investigation· San Diego County, CA· Construction & real property· Aug 18, 2026 – Aug 18, 2026· 15F06726F0001299
- Bureau of Land Management· Maricopa County, AZ· Transportation & logistics· Sep 22, 2026 – Sep 22, 2026· 140L6426F0020
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 10 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- OCCU-TEC INC$944.3K+239% in FY2026KANSAS CITY, MO · 56% of this company's obligations are in markets they both servePublic Buildings Service · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
- 3D MANAGEMENT & CONSULTING LLC$1.8M+2,041% in FY2026SIERRA VISTA, AZ · 68% of this company's obligations are in markets they both servePublic Buildings Service · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesVeterans Affairs · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
- PINEAPPLE STRATEGIES, LLC$511.6K−10% in FY2026WILMINGTON, NC · 37% of this company's obligations are in markets they both servePublic Buildings Service · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.