Federal contractor · ATLANTA, GA

ACCURA ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING SERVICES, INC.

ACCURA ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. received $13.3M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 69 awards (+76% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $66.5M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($6.7M).

Obligations · FY2026
$13.3M
New awards
69
Sole-source
7.7%
Single offer
1.5%
UEI
KPALZ4M25MM3
Small businessWoman-ownedMinority-owned8(a) program
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 8.4MFY2017
  2. 1.4MFY2018
  3. 3.8MFY2019
  4. 4.1MFY2020
  5. 4.8MFY2021
  6. 4.6MFY2022
  7. 8.4MFY2023
  8. 10MFY2024
  9. 7.6MFY2025
  10. 13.3MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$6.7M51%
    5 awards
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration$6.7M50%
    61 awards
  3. Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons$18.8K0.1%
    1 awards
  4. Environmental Protection Agency-$8690.0%
    1 awards
  5. Federal Emergency Management Agency-$103.6K0.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$7.5M56%
  2. Construction & real property$5.9M44%

Where the work was performed

  1. Madison County, AL$5.7M43%
  2. Anchorage Municipality, AK$5.6M42%
  3. Beaver County, PA$958.7K7.2%
  4. Prince George's County, MD$717.8K5.4%
  5. Accomack County, VA$287.4K2.2%
  6. Livingston County, KY$213.7K1.6%
  7. DeKalb County, GA$8,7520.1%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition9.2%
    US 39% · $1.2M
  • Sole-source awards7.7%
    US 30% · $1M
  • Single-offer competitions1.5%
    US 8.7% · $203.7K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT IN SUPPORT OF JBE054 EXTEND RUNWAY 16/34 JBER, ALASKA$4.5M
    Department of the Army· Anchorage Municipality, AK· Professional services· Jan 22, 2026 – Jan 22, 2026· W911KB26FA010
  2. REPAIR INFRASTRUCTURE AT METROPOLITAN DETENTION CENTER LOCATED IN GUAYNABO, PUERTO RICO.$4M
    Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons· DeKalb County, GA· Construction & real property· Sep 18, 2017 – Apr 14, 2026· DJBP0306S9U50001
  3. EARECKSON AIR STATION BASE YEAR 2024$2.7M
    Department of the Army· Anchorage Municipality, AK· Professional services· Mar 24, 2024 – Dec 15, 2025· W911KB24F0043
  4. PROVIDE GENERIC ENGINEERING TIME FOR MULTIPLE DESIGNS SUPPORTING LOCAL CONSTRUCTION. FWR# R001109790$1.5M
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Madison County, AL· Construction & real property· Aug 29, 2025 – Sep 29, 2026· 80MSFC25F0058
  5. PROVIDE ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING TIME FOR PRODUCING MULTIPLE DESIGNS FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF METAL ROOFS IN SUPPORT OF FACILITIES WORK REQUEST (FWR) R001149681.$1.4M
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Madison County, AL· Construction & real property· Jul 27, 2026 – Jul 27, 2026· 80MSFC26F0043
  6. PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, INCLUDING INSPECTION SERVICES AND ENGINEERING REVIEWS AT BUILDING 4203. FACILITIES WORK REQUEST (FWR) R001130429$1.3M
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Madison County, AL· Construction & real property· Mar 31, 2026 – Apr 13, 2026· 80MSFC26F0020
  7. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES (CMS), JUNIOR STRUCTURAL ENGINEER FOR THE KENTUCKY LOCK ADDITION PROJECT.$1.2M
    Department of the Army· Livingston County, KY· Construction & real property· Sep 15, 2023 – Mar 13, 2026· W912P523F0146
  8. PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES FOR WFTC CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AS FOLLOWS: REVITALIZE HP GN2 FACILITY BLDG 4659, REPAIR FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM BLDG. 4708, AND REPLACE WATER PIPING BLDG. 4708 IS SUPPORT OF FWR R001144802.$1.1M
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Madison County, AL· Construction & real property· Jul 15, 2026 – Jul 15, 2026· 80MSFC26F0037

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $255.2K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $330.8K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $181.9K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $768K reported

  1. AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.$768K
    LOS ANGELES, CA · 5 subawards · Other professional, scientific, and technical services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 6 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. EA-BAKER JV$18.6M
    HUNT VALLEY, MD · 60% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. CEMS-RS&H JV$19.1M−30% in FY2026
    SUMMERVILLE, SC · 60% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. CEMS ENGINEERING INC$19M−27% in FY2026
    SUMMERVILLE, SC · 60% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.