Federal contractor · ANCHORAGE, AK

ACS OF ANCHORAGE, LLC

ACS OF ANCHORAGE, LLC received $2,014 in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−45% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: -$237.1K. Its largest customer was Defense Information Systems Agency ($2,014). It also received $82.8M in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$2,014
New awards
1
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
KLHAYG7RYHA6
Parent company
ALASKA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS GROUP, INC
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the ACS OF ALASKA, LLC company family: 5 registered entities, $319.4K in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. ACS OF ALASKA, LLCANCHORAGE, AK · Family page
    $88.3K
  2. ACS OF FAIRBANKS, LLCANCHORAGE, AK
    $158.4K
  3. ACS OF THE NORTHLAND, LLCANCHORAGE, AK
    $40.8K
  4. ALASKA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INCANCHORAGE, AK
    $29.9K

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. -317.2KFY2017
  2. 10.2KFY2018
  3. 26.5KFY2019
  4. 1.4KFY2020
  5. -8.3KFY2021
  6. 1.4KFY2022
  7. 47.4KFY2023
  8. -4.1KFY2024
  9. 3.7KFY2025
  10. 2KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Defense Information Systems Agency$2,014100%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$2,014100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Anchorage Municipality, AK$2,014100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $2,014
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.7% · $2,014
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. ACSA000001EBM$27.1K
    Defense Information Systems Agency· Anchorage Municipality, AK· IT & telecom· Feb 22, 2023 – Mar 11, 2026· HC101914M0001

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

ACS OF ANCHORAGE, LLC received $82.8M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 4 actions (1 new awards). Its largest program was 32.002 · Universal Service Fund - High Cost ($82.7M).

Assistance · FY2026
$82.8M
New awards
1
Actions
4
Since FY2021
$83.5M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 211.5KFY2021
  2. 199.9KFY2022
  3. 48KFY2023
  4. 212.9KFY2024
  5. 82.8MFY2026

By type

  1. Direct payments$82.8M100%

Top programs

  1. 32.002 · Universal Service Fund - High Cost$82.7M99.9%
  2. 32.003 · Universal Service Fund - Lifeline$65.4K0.1%
  3. 32.005 · Universal Service Fund - Rural Health Care$3,0990.0%

Awarding agencies

  1. Federal Communications Commission$82.8M100%

Largest awards

  1. THE HIGH COST PROGRAM PROVIDES FUNDING TO COMPANIES WORKING TO EXPAND CONNECTIVITY IN UNSERVED OR UNDERSERVED AREAS$264.9M
    32.002 · Universal Service Fund - High Cost· Federal Communications Commission· Direct payment for specified use· Aug 31, 2026 – Aug 31, 2026· HC-143002683-613000-CAFII
  2. THE LIFELINE PROGRAM HELPS MAKE COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES MORE AFFORDABLE FOR LOW-INCOME CONSUMERS$300.1K
    32.003 · Universal Service Fund - Lifeline· Federal Communications Commission· Direct payment for specified use· Nov 1, 2020 – Sep 30, 2026· LI-143002683-613000
  3. THE RURAL HEALTH CARE (RHC) PROGRAM SUPPORTS HEALTH CARE FACILITIES IN BRINGING WORLD CLASS MEDICAL CARE TO RURAL AREAS THROUGH INCREASED…$3,099
    32.005 · Universal Service Fund - Rural Health Care· Federal Communications Commission· Direct payment for specified use· Jun 30, 2026 – Jun 30, 2026· RHCHCF-RHC20260010253

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 8 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SIMPLY BITS, L.L.C.$385.6K−58% in FY2026
    TUCSON, AZ · 43% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Wired telecommunications carriersAir Force · Wired and wireless telecommunications carriers
  2. CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS LLC$673.2K−32% in FY2026
    SAINT LOUIS, MO · 4 entities · 48% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Wired telecommunications carriersAir Force · Wired and wireless telecommunications carriers
  3. COX OKLAHOMA TELCOM, L.L.C$754.1K−21% in FY2026
    OKLAHOMA CITY, OK · 48% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Wired telecommunications carriersAir Force · Wired and wireless telecommunications carriers

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.