Federal contractor · ANCHORAGE, AK

ALASKA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC

ALASKA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC received $29.9K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−6.7% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $212.5K. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($29.9K).

Obligations · FY2026
$29.9K
New awards
1
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
JYN7XVLN7J67
Parent company
ALASKA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS GROUP, INC
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the ACS OF ALASKA, LLC company family: 5 registered entities, $319.4K in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. ACS OF ALASKA, LLCANCHORAGE, AK · Family page
    $88.3K
  2. ACS OF FAIRBANKS, LLCANCHORAGE, AK
    $158.4K
  3. ACS OF THE NORTHLAND, LLCANCHORAGE, AK
    $40.8K
  4. ACS OF ANCHORAGE, LLCANCHORAGE, AK
    $2,014

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 51.3KFY2017
  2. 38.7KFY2018
  3. 15.5KFY2020
  4. 45.1KFY2021
  5. 0FY2022
  6. 32.1KFY2025
  7. 29.9KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$29.9K100%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$29.9K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Anchorage Municipality, AK$29.9K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $29.9K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.7% · $29.9K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. THE ALASKA ARMY NATIONAL GUARD NETWORK ENTERPRISE CENTER (AKARNG-NEC) REQUIRES MAINTAINING CURRENT SOLUTION A PAYMENT SOLUTION FOR SERVICES PROVIDERS FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS.$29.9K
    Department of the Army· Anchorage Municipality, AK· IT & telecom· Jan 30, 2026 – Jan 30, 2026· W91ZRU26PA006

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

ALASKA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 5.3MFY2024

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2024.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 8 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SIMPLY BITS, L.L.C.$385.6K−58% in FY2026
    TUCSON, AZ · 43% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Wired telecommunications carriersAir Force · Wired and wireless telecommunications carriers
  2. CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS LLC$673.2K−32% in FY2026
    SAINT LOUIS, MO · 4 entities · 48% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Wired telecommunications carriersAir Force · Wired and wireless telecommunications carriers
  3. COX OKLAHOMA TELCOM, L.L.C$754.1K−21% in FY2026
    OKLAHOMA CITY, OK · 48% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Wired telecommunications carriersAir Force · Wired and wireless telecommunications carriers

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.