Federal contractor · EDINA, MN

ACUSTAF DEVELOPMENT CORP

ACUSTAF DEVELOPMENT CORP received $6.5M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 100 awards (−11% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $55.4M. Its largest customer was Department of Veterans Affairs ($6.4M).

Obligations · FY2026
$6.5M
New awards
100
Sole-source
1.9%
Single offer
80%
UEI
QTS5KQ4BPQ21
Parent company
ACUSTAF DEVELOPMENT CORP
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 3.3MFY2017
  2. 3MFY2018
  3. 4MFY2019
  4. 4.3MFY2020
  5. 6.4MFY2021
  6. 6.5MFY2022
  7. 6.7MFY2023
  8. 7.3MFY2024
  9. 7.3MFY2025
  10. 6.5MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 98 awards
  2. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$5.3M82%
  2. Equipment maintenance$631.3K9.7%
  3. Professional services$543.4K8.4%
  4. Health & medical$4,8790.1%

Where the work was performed

  1. Pima County, AZ$118.3K1.8%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition82%
    US 39% · $5.3M
  • Sole-source awards1.9%
    US 30% · $124K
  • Single-offer competitions80%
    US 8.8% · $5.2M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs· Hennepin County, MN· IT & telecom· Dec 11, 2020 – Aug 10, 2026· 36C24621F0075
  2. Department of Veterans Affairs· Shawnee County, KS· IT & telecom· Sep 1, 2020 – Oct 22, 2025· 36C25520F0239
  3. Department of Veterans Affairs· Charleston County, SC· IT & telecom· Aug 15, 2024 – Apr 16, 2026· 36C24724F0524
  4. Department of Veterans Affairs· Montgomery County, OH· Professional services· Feb 5, 2024 – Apr 6, 2026· 36C25024F0384
  5. Department of Veterans Affairs· Maricopa County, AZ· IT & telecom· Oct 1, 2020 – Oct 1, 2025· 36C25821F0002
  6. Department of Veterans Affairs· Shawnee County, KS· Equipment maintenance· Sep 11, 2025 – Aug 13, 2026· 36C25525F0075
  7. Department of Veterans Affairs· Hennepin County, MN· IT & telecom· Sep 16, 2022 – Aug 24, 2026· 36C24522F0529
  8. Department of Veterans Affairs· Los Angeles County, CA· IT & telecom· Sep 8, 2021 – Mar 12, 2026· 36C26221F0464

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. VETERANS ENGINEERING INCORPORATED$21.9M−107% in FY2026
    VIENNA, VA · 99.6% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Computer systems design and related services
  2. INTUITIAL SIX, LLC$20.1M+90% in FY2026
    ENCINITAS, CA · 95% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Computer systems design and related services
  3. KING GEORGE, VA · 99.6% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.