Federal contractor · ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, MD

ADAMS COMMUNICATION & ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY INC

No contract obligations recorded for ADAMS COMMUNICATION & ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY INC in FY2026. Since FY2018: $3,600.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
M6JQWFFGD949
Small businessVeteran-ownedMinority-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the ADAMS COMMUNICATION & ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY, INC. company family: 2 registered entities, $8.3M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. $8.3M

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 3.6KFY2018
  2. 0FY2019
  3. 0FY2021
  4. 0FY2022
  5. 0FY2023
  6. 0FY2024

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for ADAMS COMMUNICATION & ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY INC in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

21 companies · $3.3M reported

  1. FORT WORTH, TX · 2 subawards
  2. AMERICAN CIRCUITS, INC$372.1K
    CHARLOTTE, NC · 2 subawards · Computer and peripheral equipment manufacturing
  3. WINCHESTER, KY · 6 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Primes that pay it

5 companies · $38.2M reported

  1. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 13 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. HERNDON, VA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  3. LEXINGTON PARK, MD · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 11 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY$43.4M−73% in FY2026
    HOUGHTON, MI · 54% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development services
  2. COLLEGE STATION, TX · 48% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development services
  3. BELCAMP, MD · 98% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingAir Force · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.