Federal contractor · HOUGHTON, MI

MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY received $6M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 12 awards (−73% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $97.5M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($4.5M). It also received $26.2M in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$6M
New awards
12
Sole-source
74%
Single offer
1.7%
UEI
GKMSN3DA6P91
Other than small businessEducational institutionGovernment entity

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 5.3MFY2017
  2. 6.8MFY2018
  3. 9.2MFY2019
  4. 9.8MFY2020
  5. 7.5MFY2021
  6. 6.8MFY2022
  7. 8.6MFY2023
  8. 15.1MFY2024
  9. 22.3MFY2025
  10. 6MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 4 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 2 awards
  4. 2 awards
  5. 1 awards
  6. 1 awards
  7. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$6M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition75%
    US 39% · $4.5M
  • Sole-source awards74%
    US 30% · $4.4M
  • Single-offer competitions1.7%
    US 8.7% · $100K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Houghton County, MI· Research & development· Mar 22, 2019 – Feb 20, 2026· W56HZV19C0053
  2. Department of the Army· Houghton County, MI· Research & development· Sep 24, 2024 – May 13, 2026· W912CH24C0038
  3. Department of the Air Force· Houghton County, MI· Research & development· May 28, 2024 – Feb 4, 2026· FA239424CB014
  4. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency· Houghton County, MI· Research & development· Oct 26, 2023 – Mar 3, 2026· HR001124C0339
  5. SUDOKU$1.1M
    Department of the Air Force· Washtenaw County, MI· Research & development· Apr 29, 2024 – Dec 15, 2025· FA875024CB074
  6. Department of the Army· Houghton County, MI· Research & development· May 22, 2023 – May 8, 2026· W912HZ23C0022
  7. Department of the Army· Houghton County, MI· Research & development· Aug 21, 2024 – Jun 1, 2026· W912CG24C0017
  8. Department of the Navy· Houghton County, MI· Research & development· Mar 24, 2026 – Mar 24, 2026· N0001426C1117

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY received $26.2M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 182 actions (42 new awards), −12% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 47.076 · Stem Education (Formerly Education and Human Resources) ($5.3M).

Assistance · FY2026
$26.2M
New awards
42
Actions
182
Since FY2021
$205.8M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 43.8MFY2021
  2. 25.4MFY2022
  3. 52.9MFY2023
  4. 27.8MFY2024
  5. 29.7MFY2025
  6. 26.2MFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$25.1M96%
  2. Other assistance$1M4.0%

Top programs

  1. 47.076 · Stem Education (Formerly Education and Human Resources)$5.3M20%
  2. 43.001 · Science$3.6M14%
  3. 11.617 · Congressionally-Identified Projects$2M7.6%
  4. 12.910 · Research and Technology Development$1.5M5.8%
  5. 47.050 · Geosciences$1.4M5.3%
  6. 47.078 · Polar Programs$1.3M5.0%
  7. 15.808 · U.S. Geological Survey Research and Data Collection$1.3M4.9%
  8. 93.859 · Biomedical Research and Research Training$1.1M4.3%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of Commerce
  2. Department of Health and Human Services
  3. Department of Defense
  4. Department of the Interior
  5. Department of Agriculture
  6. Forest Service$801.7K3.1%
    Department of Agriculture

Largest awards

  1. 81.086 · Conservation Research and Development· Department of Energy· Project grant· Sep 26, 2023 – Apr 17, 2026· DEEE0010398
  2. 81.135 · Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy· Department of Energy· Cooperative agreement· Apr 27, 2021 – Jun 16, 2026· DEAR0000788
  3. 12.910 · Research and Technology Development· Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency· Cooperative agreement· Sep 30, 2024 – Feb 13, 2026· HR00112420381
  4. 15.808 · U.S. Geological Survey Research and Data Collection· U.S. Geological Survey· Cooperative agreement· Aug 29, 2022 – Feb 24, 2026· G22AC00436
  5. 47.076 · Stem Education (Formerly Education and Human Resources)· National Science Foundation· Project grant· May 29, 2024 – Sep 8, 2026· 2345094
  6. 81.086 · Conservation Research and Development· Department of Energy· Cooperative agreement· Sep 19, 2023 – Sep 17, 2026· DEEE0010604

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $1.1M (1 subaward)
  • Sub-grants: $3.4M (24 subawards)

21 sub-recipients

  1. ORLANDO, FL · 1 subaward
  2. COLUMBUS, OH · 3 subawards
  3. NEWARK, DE · 1 subaward
  4. DENTON, TX · 1 subaward
  5. SAINT LOUIS, MO · 1 subaward
  6. UNIVERSITY PARK, PA · 1 subaward
  7. CAMBRIDGE, MD · 1 subaward
  8. NASHVILLE, TN · 1 subaward
  9. SANTA BARBARA, CA · 1 subaward
  10. MADISON, WI · 2 subawards

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $381.8K (4 subawards)
  • Sub-grants: $3.6M (26 subawards)

21 primes

  1. ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 3 subawards
  2. DIMONDALE, MI · 2 subawards
  3. ANN ARBOR, MI · 6 subawards
  4. EAST LANSING, MI · 2 subawards
  5. AMHERST, MA · 1 subaward
  6. BALTIMORE, MD · 1 subaward
  7. COLUMBUS, OH · 1 subaward
  8. NEWARK, DE · 1 subaward
  9. SAN JOSE, CA · 1 subaward
  10. WASHINGTON, DC · 1 subaward

Its reported sub-contracts equal 18% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $8.4M paid out · $5.6M received
  • FY2022: $6.1M paid out · $6.7M received
  • FY2023: $6.4M paid out · $9.6M received
  • FY2024: $15.1M paid out · $11.3M received
  • FY2025: $14.2M paid out · $8.4M received
  • FY2026: $4.5M paid out · $4M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

109 companies · $54.6M reported

  1. FORT WORTH, TX · 3 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. TALLAHASSEE, FL · 8 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. YORK, PA · 3 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Primes that pay it

73 companies · $45.5M reported

  1. LANSING, MI · 5 subawards
  2. ANN ARBOR, MI · 50 subawards
  3. COLUMBUS, OH · 4 subawards · Facilities support services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 10 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. COLLEGE STATION, TX · 80% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development servicesFederal Railroad Administration · Scientific research and development services
  2. VRC METAL SYSTEMS, LLC$34.2M+142% in FY2026
    BOX ELDER, SD · 70% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Scientific research and development services
  3. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 76% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITYAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$120K
8 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$510K
$510K in its own reports

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$210K
    10 reports
  2. 2024$120K
    8 reports
  3. 2025$120K
    8 reports
  4. 2026$60K
    4 reports

Top issues

  1. Budget and appropriations29 reports
  2. Defense29 reports
  3. Science and technology23 reports
  4. Education18 reports
  5. Health issues14 reports
  6. Immigration14 reports
  7. Manufacturing14 reports
  8. Marine, maritime, boating and fisheries14 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES29 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE29 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Federal Science Partners LLC$160K
    4 reports
  2. DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC$110K
    12 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.