Federal contractor · NORTH CHARLESTON, SC

ADAPT FORWARD LLC

ADAPT FORWARD LLC received $14.7M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−68% vs FY2025). Since FY2019: $185.9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($14.7M).

Obligations · FY2026
$14.7M
New awards
2
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
FH74MM2CFW63
Small businessVeteran-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 500FY2019
  2. 0FY2020
  3. 30.9MFY2021
  4. 33.7MFY2022
  5. 23.4MFY2023
  6. 36.3MFY2024
  7. 46.7MFY2025
  8. 14.7MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Navy$14.7M100.0%
    1 awards
  2. Missile Defense Agency$5000.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$14.7M100.0%
  2. Research & development$5000.0%

Where the work was performed

  1. Charleston County, SC$14.7M100.0%
  2. Madison County, AL$5000.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. THE PURPOSE OF THIS TASK ORDER IS TO PROVIDE ITERATIVE DEFENSIVE CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS CAPABILITIES IN SUPPORT OF NIWC ATLANTIC CSSP. THIS WILL BE A CPFF TASK ORDER WITH A BASE PERIOD AND FOUR ONE-YEAR OPTION PERIODS.$185.9M
    Department of the Navy· Charleston County, SC· Professional services· Dec 4, 2020 – Mar 27, 2026· N6523621F3002
  2. SCALABLE HOMELAND INNOVATIVE ENTERPRISE LAYERED DEFENSE (SHIELD) INITIAL ORDER.$500
    Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Dec 5, 2025 – Jun 4, 2026· HQ085926FE825

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $106.2K reported

  1. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION$106.2K
    FORT WORTH, TX · 2 subawards · Computer systems design and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. DELTA RESOURCES, INC.$98M−21% in FY2026
    ALEXANDRIA, VA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. CYDECOR INC.$97.8M−44% in FY2026
    ARLINGTON, VA · 99.5% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. EAGLE SYSTEMS INC$99.8M−16% in FY2026
    CALIFORNIA, MD · 100.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.