Federal contractor · FORT WORTH, TX

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION received $13B in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 589 awards (−62% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $218.9B. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($10.4B).

Obligations · FY2026
$13B
New awards
589
Sole-source
99.8%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
G4KDGE4JFFK7
Parent company
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

128 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $46.1B in FY2026 together.

  1. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATIONFORT WORTH, TX · Family page
    $13B
  2. $13.3B
  3. $2.9B
  4. $2.7B
  5. $2.5B
  6. $2.3B
  7. $2.2B
  8. $1.5B
  9. $1.1B
  10. $737.4M
  11. $666M
  12. $616.8M
  13. $385M
  14. $366.6M
  15. $351.6M
  16. $351.4M
  17. $241.1M
  18. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATIONCOLORADO SPRINGS, CO
    $237.6M
  19. $194.4M
  20. $139M
Show all 128 members
  1. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPKING OF PRUSSIA, PA
    $134.7M
  2. LOCKHEED MARTIN SERVICES, LLCCOLORADO SPRINGS, CO
    $102.4M
  3. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATIONKING OF PRUSSIA, PA
    $70.7M
  4. $46M
  5. $25.9M
  6. $24.5M
  7. $23.7M
  8. $22.4M
  9. $19.2M
  10. $10.2M
  11. $8.9M
  12. $8.3M
  13. $6.3M
  14. $4.9M
  15. $4.6M
  16. $4.4M
  17. $4.2M
  18. $3.8M
  19. $2.5M
  20. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPCOLORADO SPRINGS, CO
    $1.9M
  21. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATIONKING OF PRUSSIA, PA
    $1.2M
  22. $972.5K
  23. ENFLITE LLCGEORGETOWN, TX
    $958.8K
  24. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPNEW ORLEANS, LA
    $506.4K
  25. $298.1K
  26. $167K
  27. $51.5K
  28. $50.9K
  29. $24K
  30. $17.1K
  31. $9,075
  32. $0
  33. $0
  34. $0
  35. $0
  36. $0
  37. $0
  38. LIFEPORT LLCWOODLAND, WA
    $0
  39. $0
  40. $0
  41. $0
  42. $0
  43. LOCKHEED MARTIN CANADA INCSAINT-LAURENT, CAN
    $0
  44. $0
  45. $0
  46. $0
  47. $0
  48. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATIONCOLORADO SPRINGS, CO
    $0
  49. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATIONCOLORADO SPRINGS, CO
    $0
  50. $0
  51. $0
  52. $0
  53. $0
  54. $0
  55. $0
  56. $0
  57. $0
  58. $0
  59. $0
  60. $0
  61. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATIONABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, MD
    $0
  62. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATIONKING OF PRUSSIA, PA
    $0
  63. $0
  64. $0
  65. $0
  66. $0
  67. $0
  68. $0
  69. $0
  70. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATIONKING OF PRUSSIA, PA
    $0
  71. $0
  72. $0
  73. $0
  74. $0
  75. $0
  76. $0
  77. $0
  78. $0
  79. $0
  80. $0
  81. $0
  82. $0
  83. $0
  84. $0
  85. $0
  86. $0
  87. $0
  88. $0
  89. $0
  90. $0
  91. $0
  92. $0
  93. OAO CORPORATIONCOLORADO SPRIN, CO
    $0
  94. PREDASAR CORPIRVINE, CA
    $0
  95. $0
  96. $0
  97. -$0.47
  98. -$169
  99. -$3,103
  100. -$35.9K
  101. -$45K
  102. -$110.6K
  103. -$167.3K
  104. -$192.2K
  105. -$331.1K
  106. -$382.8K
  107. -$1.6M
  108. -$4.2M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 27.4BFY2017
  2. 15.5BFY2018
  3. 14.6BFY2019
  4. 40BFY2020
  5. 10.6BFY2021
  6. 17BFY2022
  7. 32.5BFY2023
  8. 14.4BFY2024
  9. 34.1BFY2025
  10. 13BFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 133 awards
  2. 323 awards
  3. 23 awards
  4. 11 awards
  5. 90 awards
  6. 4 awards
  7. U.S. Coast Guard$412.8K0.0%
    2 awards
  8. 1 awards
  9. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$9.5B73%
  2. Equipment maintenance$1.5B12%
  3. Research & development$1.5B12%
  4. Other equipment & supplies$261M2.0%
  5. Professional services$136.5M1.1%
  6. IT & telecom$611.1K0.0%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$22.4M0.2%
  2. Davis County, UT$481.9K0.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition99.8%
    US 39% · $12.9B
  • Sole-source awards99.8%
    US 30% · $12.9B
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $230.2K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 23 awards
  2. Department of Defense · 32 awards
  3. Department of Defense · 2 awards
  4. Department of Defense · 36 awards
  5. National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Tarrant County, TX· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Apr 28, 2017 – Apr 15, 2026· N0001917C0001
  2. Defense Contract Management Agency· Tarrant County, TX· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Nov 26, 2019 – Jun 9, 2026· N0001920C0009
  3. Defense Contract Management Agency· Tarrant County, TX· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Dec 23, 2022 – May 14, 2026· N0001923C0003
  4. Defense Contract Management Agency· Tarrant County, TX· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Oct 7, 2016 – Feb 4, 2026· N0001916C0033
  5. Department of the Navy· Arlington County, VA· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Jun 27, 2024 – May 28, 2026· N0001924C0039
  6. Defense Contract Management Agency· Tarrant County, TX· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Oct 4, 2016 – Oct 16, 2025· N0001911C0083
  7. Defense Contract Management Agency· Tarrant County, TX· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Oct 3, 2016 – Jun 4, 2026· N0001913C0008
  8. Department of the Air Force· Tarrant County, TX· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Aug 14, 2020 – Jun 12, 2026· FA861520F0001

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 2 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
2
Since FY2021
$459K

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 398KFY2021
  2. 0FY2022
  3. 0FY2023
  4. 61KFY2024
  5. 0FY2025
  6. 0FY2026

Largest awards

  1. 43.002 · Aeronautics· National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Cooperative agreement· Nov 2, 2023 – May 6, 2026· 80NSSC24M0027

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $170.3M (5 subawards)
  • Sub-grants: $549.9K (1 subaward)

5 primes

  1. MCKINNEY, TX · 1 subaward
  2. ENGLEWOOD, CO · 1 subaward
  3. BLAIRSVILLE, PA · 1 subaward
  4. SAN DIEGO, CA · 2 subawards
  5. CHANTILLY, VA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $11.8B paid out · $2.3M received
  • FY2022: $8.3B paid out · $2.3M received
  • FY2023: $5.2B paid out · $12.2M received
  • FY2024: $4.8B paid out · $4.8M received
  • FY2025: $8.8B paid out · $246.6M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $170.9M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

4,982 companies · $247.8B reported

  1. MELBOURNE, FL · 6,189 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. MARINETTE, WI · 304 subawards · Ship and boat building
  3. TUCSON, AZ · 6,713 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Primes that pay it

115 companies · $3.1B reported

  1. MELBOURNE, FL · 318 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. FORT WORTH, TX · 25 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. TUCSON, AZ · 16 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 143 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. RAYTHEON COMPANY$84.4B−24% in FY2026
    TUCSON, AZ · 227 entities · 37% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingDefense Contract Management Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing+13 more
  2. THE BOEING COMPANY$74.6B+20% in FY2026
    SAINT LOUIS, MO · 99 entities · 31% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingDefense Contract Management Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing+7 more
  3. MELBOURNE, FL · 159 entities · 20% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services+15 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION (128 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATIONAI match · 100%
  • LifePortAI match · 97%
Lobbying · 2025
$15.6M
59 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$50.2M
$50.2M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$1.2M
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$13.9M
    60 reports
  2. 2024$12.4M
    47 reports
  3. 2025$15.6M
    59 reports
  4. 2026$8.3M
    30 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense180 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations81 reports
  3. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code59 reports
  4. Aerospace17 reports
  5. Intelligence and surveillance15 reports
  6. Government issues14 reports
  7. Transportation14 reports
  8. Trade (domestic and foreign)14 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. SENATE162 reports
  2. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES159 reports
  3. Navy - Dept of21 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Penn Avenue Partners$700K
    14 reports
  2. TheGROUP DC, LLC$650K
    14 reports
  3. Capitol Counsel LLC$630K
    14 reports
  4. Etherton and Associates, Inc.$450K
    14 reports
  5. Venable LLP$430K
    14 reports
  6. Public Strategies Washington, Inc.$420K
    14 reports
  7. Ballard Spahr LLP$420K
    14 reports
  8. Michael Best Strategies LLC$380K
    5 reports

21 firms in all. Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$742K59%
  2. Democratic$498.5K40%
  3. Other or none$7,0000.6%

PACs sponsored

  • LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION EMPLOYEES' POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$3.5M raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.