Federal contractor · ARLINGTON, VA

AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.

No contract obligations recorded for AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. in FY2026. Since FY2017: $5.8M.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
Q63UDLTH2FN4
Parent company
AECOM
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. company family: 123 registered entities, $303.3M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.LOS ANGELES, CA · Family page
    $241.6M
  2. AECOM SERVICES, LLCARLINGTON, VA
    $19.4M
  3. SHIMMICK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.IRVINE, CA
    $12.2M
  4. AECOM-B&V MIDDLE EAST JVROANOKE, VA
    $7.1M
  5. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT & PLANNING SOLUTIONS LLCBOULDER, CO
    $6.5M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. -886.8KFY2017
  2. -109.2KFY2018
  3. 12.5MFY2019
  4. 236.3KFY2020
  5. 138.9KFY2021
  6. 761.2KFY2022
  7. 0FY2023
  8. 4.6KFY2024
  9. -6.9MFY2025

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $26.7M (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. SUNDT CONSTRUCTION, INC.$26.7M100%
    TEMPE, AZ · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $300K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $26.7M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

834 companies · $1.3B reported

  1. RUST CONSTRUCTORS INC.$259.4M
    DENVER, CO · 3 subawards · Nonresidential building construction
  2. SKANSKA USA CIVIL NORTHEAST INC$156.7M
    EAST ELMHURST, NY · 1 subaward · Nonresidential building construction
  3. SGS NORTH AMERICA INC.$41.1M
    RUTHERFORD, NJ · 27 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

51 companies · $688.5M reported

  1. TRIAD NATIONAL SECURITY, LLC$504.1M
    COLUMBUS, OH · 6 subawards · Facilities support services
  2. SUNDT CONSTRUCTION, INC.$26.7M
    TEMPE, AZ · 1 subaward · Nonresidential building construction
  3. STANLEY CONSULTANTS, INC.$25.9M
    MUSCATINE, IA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 63 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CH2M HILL, INC$2B−18% in FY2026
    ENGLEWOOD, CO · 92 entities · 71% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesEnvironmental Protection Agency · Remediation and other waste management services+11 more
  2. HDR ENVIRONMENTAL, OPERATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION, INC.$619M−51% in FY2026
    ENGLEWOOD, CO · 68 entities · 28% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services+6 more
  3. BURNS & MCDONNELL ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC.$444.1M−65% in FY2026
    KANSAS CITY, MO · 3 entities · 25% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesState · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. (123 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • AECOMAI match · 100%
  • AECOM Technical Services, Inc.AI match · 100%
  • Shimmick CorporationAI match · 98%
Lobbying · 2025
$1.2M
26 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$3.9M
$3.9M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$213.5K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$790K
    20 reports
  2. 2024$910K
    21 reports
  3. 2025$1.2M
    26 reports
  4. 2026$1M
    17 reports

Top issues

  1. Transportation43 reports
  2. Defense38 reports
  3. Budget and appropriations33 reports
  4. Disaster planning and emergencies31 reports
  5. Clean air and water28 reports
  6. Energy and nuclear18 reports
  7. Aviation, aircraft and airlines15 reports
  8. Roads and highways15 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES73 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE71 reports
  3. Executive Office of the President (EOP)18 reports
  4. Transportation - Dept of (DOT)18 reports
  5. State - Dept of (DOS)16 reports
  6. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)12 reports
  7. Defense - Dept of (DOD)9 reports
  8. U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID)8 reports
  9. Federal Railroad Administration6 reports
  10. Army - Dept of (Other)5 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Fierce Government Relations$520K
    14 reports
  2. ELEVATE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, LLC$520K
    14 reports
  3. SBL Strategies, LLC$430K
    12 reports
  4. BALLARD PARTNERS$390K
    7 reports
  5. American Defense International, Inc.$280K
    14 reports
  6. H.A. Cumber & Company, Inc.$200K
    4 reports
  7. Van Scoyoc Associates$130K
    2 reports
  8. COVENANT GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, LLC$78K
    2 reports

9 firms in all. Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$123.5K58%
  2. Democratic$90K42%

PACs sponsored

  • AECOM PAC$386.7K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.