Federal contractor · TEMPE, AZ

SUNDT CONSTRUCTION, INC.

SUNDT CONSTRUCTION, INC. received $443.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards. Since FY2017: $382.2M. Its largest customer was U.S. Customs and Border Protection ($443.1M).

Obligations · FY2026
$443.1M
New awards
1
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
NEV1XR5H3FG5
Parent company
THE SUNDT COMPANIES INC
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 619.4KFY2017
  2. -62.2MFY2018
  3. 1.5MFY2019
  4. -1.1MFY2020
  5. 233.8KFY2021
  6. 0FY2023
  7. 0FY2024
  8. 443.1MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$443.1M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications100%
    US 5.1% · $443.1M

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. U.S. Customs and Border Protection· Imperial County, CA· Construction & real property· May 28, 2026 – May 28, 2026· 70B01C26F00000403

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $102.9M (9 subawards)

9 sub-recipients

  1. ARLINGTON, VA · 1 subaward
  2. AF STEEL FABRICATORS, L.L.C.$24.4M24%
    CHANDLER, AZ · 1 subaward
  3. OTTO TRUCKING INC$22.8M22%
    MESA, AZ · 1 subaward
  4. HUITT - ZOLLARS, INC$21.1M21%
    SAN DIEGO, CA · 1 subaward
  5. EPIFINI LANDSCAPING INC$4.8M4.7%
    CASA GRANDE, AZ · 1 subaward
  6. SAFETY & SECURITY SOLUTIONS LLC$1.5M1.5%
    DAYTON, OH · 1 subaward
  7. METAL PRO, INC.$676.7K0.7%
    PHOENIX, AZ · 1 subaward
  8. SQUIRES LUMBER COMPANY$327.2K0.3%
    COLTON, CA · 1 subaward
  9. ATLAS CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY INC$297.8K0.3%
    SAN DIEGO, CA · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Its reported sub-contracts equal 23% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

9 companies · $102.9M reported

  1. LOS ANGELES, CA · 1 subaward · Nonresidential building construction
  2. AF STEEL FABRICATORS, L.L.C.$24.4M
    CHANDLER, AZ · 1 subaward · Nonresidential building construction
  3. OTTO TRUCKING INC$22.8M
    MESA, AZ · 1 subaward · Nonresidential building construction

Primes that pay it

No prime reported paying it.

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BARNARD SPENCER JOINT VENTURE$564.6M−85% in FY2026
    BOZEMAN, MT · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Customs and Border Protection · Nonresidential building construction
  2. FREDERICKSBURG, VA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Customs and Border Protection · Nonresidential building construction
  3. WATSONVILLE, CA · 4 entities · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Customs and Border Protection · Nonresidential building construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.