Federal contractor · BOSTON, MA
AECOM + TETRA TECH JOINT VENTURE
AECOM + TETRA TECH JOINT VENTURE received $29.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 8 awards (+235% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $152M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($29.2M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $29.2M
- New awards
- 8
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 24%
- UEI
- XJTGR4AL3TH1
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 7.4MFY2017
- 7.5MFY2018
- 8.3MFY2019
- 26MFY2020
- 14.7MFY2021
- 24.6MFY2022
- 15.2MFY2023
- 10.4MFY2024
- 8.7MFY2025
- 29.2MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Army$29.2M100%8 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Construction & real property$29.2M100%
Where the work was performed
- Laramie County, WY$22.7M78%
- Suffolk County, MA$6.9M24%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition24%US 39% · $7M
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions24%US 8.7% · $7M
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- DESIGN-BUILD REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL DEVELOPMENT FOR UTILITY CORRIDOR AT FRANCIS E. WARREN AFB, WYOMING$28.4MDepartment of the Army· Laramie County, WY· Construction & real property· Jul 10, 2025 – Mar 3, 2026· W9128F25FA079
- Department of the Army· Suffolk County, MA· Construction & real property· Jul 20, 2023 – Oct 14, 2025· W912ER23F0059
- Department of the Army· Suffolk County, MA· Construction & real property· Dec 19, 2025 – Jan 8, 2026· W912ER26FA003
- Department of the Army· Suffolk County, MA· Construction & real property· Sep 29, 2025 – May 1, 2026· W912DY25FA286
- CLR033 W911KB 23F0057$68.6KDepartment of the Army· Denali Borough, AK· Construction & real property· May 16, 2023 – Oct 23, 2025· W911KB23F0057
- Department of the Army· Suffolk County, MA· Construction & real property· Jan 21, 2026 – Jan 21, 2026· W912DY26FA033
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- JLL-RER SOLUTIONS, LLC$50.6M−100% in FY2026HERNDON, VA · 99.8% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- BENHAM-STANLEY, LLC$53.2M−106% in FY2026OKLAHOMA CITY, OK · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- MPR ASSOCIATES, INC.$43.6M−4.9% in FY2026ALEXANDRIA, VA · 90% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.