Federal contractor · ENTERPRISE, AL

NAVIGATOR DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.

NAVIGATOR DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC. received $495.5K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (−97% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $68.3M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($495K).

Obligations · FY2026
$495.5K
New awards
5
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
E6JFJLBFNC21
Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. -487.6KFY2017
  2. 1MFY2018
  3. 4.1MFY2019
  4. 7.2MFY2020
  5. 6MFY2021
  6. 12.1MFY2022
  7. 10MFY2023
  8. 12.9MFY2024
  9. 14.9MFY2025
  10. 495.5KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 4 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$602.6K99.9%
  2. Research & development$5000.1%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Professional services· Feb 3, 2021 – Jun 10, 2026· W31P4Q21FD001
  2. Department of the Army· Dale County, AL· IT & telecom· May 14, 2020 – Apr 7, 2026· W9124G20F0028
  3. Department of the Army· Comanche County, OK· Education & social services· Jul 31, 2023 – May 19, 2026· W9124L23F0024
  4. Department of the Army· Dale County, AL· Education & social services· Sep 15, 2025 – Nov 6, 2025· W9124G25CA006
  5. Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Dec 5, 2025 – Dec 5, 2025· HQ085926FE007

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $4.6M paid out · $2.7M received
  • FY2022: $13.6M paid out · $4.6M received
  • FY2023: $7.9M paid out · $8.6M received
  • FY2024: $342.8K paid out · $6.5M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $2.9M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

8 companies · $26.4M reported

  1. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. ALEXANDRIA, VA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

9 companies · $25.3M reported

  1. ARLINGTON, TX · 5 subawards · Technical and trade schools
  2. HOUSTON, TX · 4 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. RESTON, VA · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. GAN CORPORATION$27.8M−63% in FY2026
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 98% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. R. WARD & ASSOCIATES, INC.$28.6M−84% in FY2026
    OZARK, MO · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. JG&A-TSG JV$28.8M−71% in FY2026
    MARIETTA, GA · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.