Federal contractor · LEWISTON, ID

AGPRO MARKETING AND MANUFACTURING, INC

AGPRO MARKETING AND MANUFACTURING, INC received $318.5K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (+738% vs FY2025). Since FY2018: $363.5K. Its largest customer was Agricultural Research Service ($318.5K).

Obligations · FY2026
$318.5K
New awards
2
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
PBGNBYABKSA3
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 7.1KFY2018
  2. 38KFY2025
  3. 318.5KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$318.5K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Agricultural Research Service· Whitman County, WA· Other equipment & supplies· Jun 8, 2026 – Jun 8, 2026· 1232SA26P0269
  2. Agricultural Research Service· Umatilla County, OR· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 30, 2025 – Dec 23, 2025· 1232SA25P0635

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

AGPRO MARKETING AND MANUFACTURING, INC received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 0FY2023

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2023.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. RITCHIE IMPLEMENT, INC.$359.6K+67% in FY2026
    COBB, WI · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAgricultural Research Service · Agriculture, construction, and mining machinery manufacturing
  2. OSSIAN, IN · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAgricultural Research Service · Agriculture, construction, and mining machinery manufacturing
  3. MINIER, IL · 83% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAgricultural Research Service · Agriculture, construction, and mining machinery manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.