Federal contractor · IRVINE, CA

AHTNA-CDM SMITH JV

AHTNA-CDM SMITH JV received $930.2K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (−15% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $120.4M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($930.2K).

Obligations · FY2026
$930.2K
New awards
6
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
PCNBBY9CJAJ6
Small business8(a) programNative-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 9KFY2017
  2. 23.2MFY2018
  3. 24.7MFY2020
  4. 4.4MFY2021
  5. 4.1MFY2022
  6. 27.7MFY2023
  7. 34.3MFY2024
  8. 1.1MFY2025
  9. 930.2KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 6 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$930.2K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Air Force· Sedgwick County, KS· Construction & real property· Apr 10, 2024 – May 8, 2026· FA462124F0017
  2. Department of the Air Force· Sebastian County, AR· Construction & real property· Sep 28, 2023 – Jun 12, 2026· FA890323F0146
  3. Department of the Air Force· Sebastian County, AR· Construction & real property· Sep 22, 2023 – Nov 17, 2025· FA890323F0145
  4. Department of the Air Force· Montgomery County, AL· Construction & real property· Sep 28, 2023 – Jun 5, 2026· FA890323F0130
  5. Department of the Air Force· Yuba County, CA· Construction & real property· Jun 30, 2023 – Dec 1, 2025· FA468623F0022
  6. Department of the Air Force· Yuba County, CA· Construction & real property· Sep 12, 2022 – Dec 11, 2025· FA468622F0041

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CMS K.K.$37M+7,399,901% in FY2026
    NAKAGAMI-GUN, JPN · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Nonresidential building construction
  2. SAHARA PALMS INC$35.1M−78% in FY2026
    FRUITLAND, UT · 97% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Nonresidential building construction
  3. BREA, CA · 2 entities · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Nonresidential building construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.