Federal contractor · BREA, CA

INSIGHT ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION, INC.

INSIGHT ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION, INC. received $6.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (−75% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $104.2M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($6.2M).

Obligations · FY2026
$6.2M
New awards
4
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
DWVPN5TDC2F1
Small businessMinority-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $7.1M in FY2026 together.

  1. INSIGHT ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION, INC.BREA, CA · Family page
    $6.2M
  2. $814.2K

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 3KFY2017
  2. 5.2MFY2020
  3. 4.8MFY2021
  4. 2.4MFY2022
  5. 55.8MFY2023
  6. 4.9MFY2024
  7. 24.8MFY2025
  8. 6.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 4 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$6.2M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Yuba County, CA$149.3K2.4%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Air Force· Los Angeles County, CA· Construction & real property· Jul 27, 2023 – Jan 14, 2026· FA890323F0107
  2. Department of the Air Force· Yuba County, CA· Construction & real property· Jul 20, 2023 – Apr 24, 2026· FA468623F0028
  3. Department of the Air Force· Clark County, NV· Construction & real property· Dec 8, 2022 – May 29, 2026· FA890323F0015
  4. Department of the Air Force· Nye County, NV· Construction & real property· Nov 21, 2022 – Apr 10, 2026· FA890323F0014

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $310K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $298.6K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $608.6K reported

  1. LEXINGTON, MA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  2. PASADENA, CA · 1 subaward · Remediation and other waste management services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. AHTNA-CDM SMITH JV$36.3M−15% in FY2026
    IRVINE, CA · 96% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Nonresidential building construction
  2. SAHARA PALMS INC$35.1M−78% in FY2026
    FRUITLAND, UT · 93% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Nonresidential building construction
  3. CMS K.K.$37M+7,399,901% in FY2026
    NAKAGAMI-GUN, JPN · 96% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Nonresidential building construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.