Federal contractor · BIRMINGHAM, AL

ALABAMA POWER COMPANY

ALABAMA POWER COMPANY received $19M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 22 awards (−33% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $169.4M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($10.8M).

Obligations · FY2026
$19M
New awards
22
Sole-source
89%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
GCBYRGEMHJQ1
Parent company
SOUTHERN CO SERVICES INC
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the POWERSECURE, INC. company family: 15 registered entities, $111.1M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. POWERSECURE, INC.WAKE FOREST, NC · Family page
    $0
  2. ATLANTA GAS LIGHT COMPANYATLANTA, GA
    $52.1M
  3. MISSISSIPPI POWER COGULFPORT, MS
    $24.5M
  4. GEORGIA POWER COMPANYATLANTA, GA
    $8M
  5. GEORGIA POWER COMPANYATLANTA, GA
    $3.9M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 9.4MFY2017
  2. 34MFY2018
  3. 10.7MFY2019
  4. 12.3MFY2020
  5. 9.1MFY2021
  6. 16.4MFY2022
  7. 13.3MFY2023
  8. 16.8MFY2024
  9. 28.4MFY2025
  10. 19MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$10.8M57%
    14 awards
  2. Federal Emergency Management Agency$3.3M17%
    2 awards
  3. Defense Logistics Agency$2.2M11%
    1 awards
  4. Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons$1.9M9.8%
    2 awards
  5. Department of the Air Force$614.3K3.2%
    1 awards
  6. Department of Veterans Affairs$323.7K1.7%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$19M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Calhoun County, AL$13.3M70%
  2. Dale County, AL$2.2M11%
  3. Fulton County, GA$1.9M9.8%
  4. Montgomery County, AL$614.3K3.2%
  5. Tuscaloosa County, AL$317.1K1.7%
  6. Jefferson County, AL$316.6K1.7%
  7. Lowndes County, MS$141.7K0.7%
  8. Lowndes County, AL$116K0.6%
  9. Clay County, GA$87.6K0.5%
  10. Mobile County, AL$78.1K0.4%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition89%
    US 39% · $16.8M
  • Sole-source awards89%
    US 30% · $16.8M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Army$10.8M
    Department of Defense · 3 awards
  2. Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons$1.9M
    Department of Justice · 2 awards
  3. Department of Veterans Affairs$323.7K
    Department of Veterans Affairs · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. 200309!009606!97AS!0600 !DEFENSE ENERGY SUPPORT CENTER !SP060003C8262 !A!N! !N! !20030523!20030523!006900120!006900120!006925341!N!ALABAMA POWER COMPANY !600 NORTH 18TH STREET !BIRMINGHAM !AL!35291!27640!031!01!FORT RUCKER !COFFEE !ALABAMA !+000001875912!N!Y!000087983040!S112!ELECTRIC SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !4000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !221122!E! !3!C!S! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !B! !A!N!K!2!002!B! !C!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !C!C!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !$78.1M
    Defense Logistics Agency· Dale County, AL· Facilities & utilities· Oct 21, 2016 – May 4, 2026· SP060003C8262
  2. UESC ANNISTON ARMY DEPOT IMPLEMENTATION$20M
    Department of the Army· Calhoun County, AL· Facilities & utilities· May 14, 2025 – Apr 17, 2026· W912DY25F0041
  3. 10 YEAR (BASE + 9 OPTIONS) TASK ORDER AGAINST THE GSA AREA WIDE CONTRACT FOR ELECTRIC UTILITY SERVICES AT THE CENTER FOR DOMESTIC PREPAREDNESS (CDP) IN ANNISTON, AL. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ELECTRIC UTILITY SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH GSA AREAWIDE CON$9.8M
    Federal Emergency Management Agency· Calhoun County, AL· Facilities & utilities· Aug 23, 2023 – Sep 2, 2026· 70FA2023F00000060
  4. IGF::OT::IGF$5.7M
    Department of the Air Force· Montgomery County, AL· Facilities & utilities· Jul 20, 2017 – Mar 30, 2026· FA330016F0012
  5. BWT ELECTRIC UTILITY SERVICES$2.2M
    Department of the Army· Marengo County, AL· Facilities & utilities· Dec 2, 2016 – Jan 28, 2026· W9127816F0002
  6. ELECTRIC SERVICE FOR TENN-TOM MANAGEMENT OFFICE$1.8M
    Department of the Army· Lowndes County, MS· Facilities & utilities· Jun 7, 2017 – Apr 20, 2026· W9127817F0016
  7. ELECTRIC UTILITY SERVICES FOR BWT/ALCOOSA PROJECT MANAGEMENT OFFICE AND COMPOND, ARL POWER FOR LOCKS, AND DESIGNATED AREAS.$1.7M
    Department of the Army· Tuscaloosa County, AL· Facilities & utilities· Mar 26, 2020 – Mar 18, 2026· W9127820F0088
  8. FY17 ALABAMA POWER COMPANY$1.7M
    Department of the Army· Clay County, GA· Facilities & utilities· Aug 23, 2017 – Jun 3, 2026· W9127817F0090

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

ALABAMA POWER COMPANY received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 1 actions (1 new awards). Its largest program was 81.126 · Federal Loan Guarantees for Innovative Energy Technologies ($0).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
Loan face value
$4.1B
lent or guaranteed
Actions
1
Since FY2023
$25.2K

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 25.2KFY2023
  2. 0FY2026

By type

  1. Loans$00.0%
    $4.1B lent or guaranteed

Top programs

  1. 81.126 · Federal Loan Guarantees for Innovative Energy Technologies$00.0%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of Energy$00.0%

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2023–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $270K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. EDUCATION & TRAINING RESOURCES LLC$270K100%
    BOWLING GREEN, KY · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $360K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $180K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $330K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $270K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

5 companies · $51M reported

  1. JOHNSON CONTROLS GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS, LLC$49.1M
    MILWAUKEE, WI · 4 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. EDUCATION & TRAINING RESOURCES LLC$1.1M
    BOWLING GREEN, KY · 4 subawards · Technical and trade schools
  3. ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION$354.6K
    GROTON, CT · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 29 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SHO-ME POWER ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE$53.6M−15% in FY2026
    MARSHFIELD, MO · 22% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Electric power generation, transmission and distribution
  2. CANOOCHEE ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORP$37.1M−38% in FY2026
    REIDSVILLE, GA · 19% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Electric power generation, transmission and distributionDefense Logistics Agency · Electric power generation, transmission and distribution
  3. HAWAIIAN ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.$42.1M+55% in FY2026
    HONOLULU, HI · 19% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Electric power generation, transmission and distributionFederal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons · Electric power generation, transmission and distributionAir Force · Electric power generation, transmission and distribution+1 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of POWERSECURE, INC. (15 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • ALABAMA POWER COMPANYAI match · 100%
  • GEORGIA POWER COMPANYAI match · 100%
  • MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANYAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2026
$30K
2 reports
PAC giving · 2026
$146K
3 PACs

Lobbying by year

  1. 2026$30K
    2 reports

Top issues

Who was contacted

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Cornerstone Government Affairs, Inc.$30K
    2 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$98.5K67%
  2. Democratic$47.5K33%

PACs sponsored

  • ALABAMA POWER CO EMPLOYEES FEDERAL POLITICAL ACTION CMTE (APC EMPLOYEES FEDERAL PAC)$134.3K raised this cycle
  • GEORGIA POWER COMPANY FEDERAL PAC$85.8K raised this cycle
  • MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY FEDERAL PAC$31.8K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.