Federal contractor · HANOVER, MD

ALLIANCE TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LLC

ALLIANCE TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LLC received $21M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 78 awards (+3.2% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $267M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($4.6M). It also received $3,768 in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$21M
New awards
78
Sole-source
8.5%
Single offer
44%
UEI
UCM7WPGJBZ67
Small businessWoman-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 50.2MFY2017
  2. 36.8MFY2018
  3. 31MFY2019
  4. 46.2MFY2020
  5. 17.2MFY2021
  6. 10.9MFY2022
  7. 22.9MFY2023
  8. 10.6MFY2024
  9. 20.3MFY2025
  10. 21MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 5 awards
  2. 3 awards
  3. 3 awards
  4. 6 awards
  5. 1 awards
  6. 1 awards
  7. 6 awards
  8. 2 awards
  9. 12 awards
  10. 8 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$20.4M97%
  2. Other equipment & supplies$610.5K2.9%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition52%
    US 39% · $10.9M
  • Sole-source awards8.5%
    US 30% · $1.8M
  • Single-offer competitions44%
    US 8.8% · $9.1M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Air Force· Lowndes County, MS· IT & telecom· Oct 2, 2023 – Jun 9, 2026· FA302224F0001
  2. Department of the Air Force· St. Clair County, IL· IT & telecom· Feb 21, 2023 – Mar 4, 2026· FA830723FB025
  3. Federal Bureau of Investigation· Howard County, MD· IT & telecom· Jun 23, 2025 – Aug 14, 2026· 15F06725P0000543
  4. Defense Information Systems Agency· Anne Arundel County, MD· IT & telecom· Feb 21, 2025 – Nov 21, 2025· HC102825F0225
  5. Bureau of the Fiscal Service· Howard County, MD· IT & telecom· Feb 16, 2023 – May 5, 2026· 2033H623F00062
  6. U.S. Geological Survey· Howard County, MD· IT & telecom· Jun 24, 2022 – Jun 16, 2026· 140G0122F0241
  7. Department of the Air Force· Pulaski County, AR· IT & telecom· Oct 1, 2024 – Jan 26, 2026· FA446025F0004

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

ALLIANCE TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LLC received $3,768 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 2 actions (2 new awards). Its largest program was 32.004 · Universal Service Fund - Schools and Libraries ($3,768).

Assistance · FY2026
$3,768
New awards
2
Actions
2
Since FY2022
$39.3K

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 0FY2022
  2. 44.3KFY2023
  3. -8.7KFY2024
  4. 3.8KFY2026

By type

  1. Direct payments$3,768100%

Top programs

  1. 32.004 · Universal Service Fund - Schools and Libraries$3,768100%

Awarding agencies

Largest awards

  1. 32.004 · Universal Service Fund - Schools and Libraries· Federal Communications Commission· Direct payment for specified use· Jun 15, 2026 – Jun 15, 2026· SL-2699038764
  2. 32.004 · Universal Service Fund - Schools and Libraries· Federal Communications Commission· Direct payment for specified use· Jun 15, 2026 – Jun 15, 2026· SL-2699062607

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2022–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $1.2M (9 subawards)

5 primes

  1. LYNCHBURG, VA · 5 subawards
  2. SUPPLYCORE LLC$247.1K21%
    ROCKFORD, IL · 1 subaward
  3. FAIRFAX, VA · 1 subaward
  4. RESTON, VA · 1 subaward
  5. ALEXANDRIA, VA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $9.9M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $8.4M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $6.1M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $9.2M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $4M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $1.2M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

20 companies · $38.8M reported

  1. FREDERICK, MD · 106 subawards · Facilities support services
  2. BALTIMORE, MD · 3 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. LYNCHBURG, VA · 10 subawards · Facilities support services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 55 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. 4 STAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$69M−77% in FY2026
    VIRGINIA BEACH, VA · 53% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Computer systems design and related servicesDefense Information Systems Agency · Computer systems design and related servicesNavy · Computer systems design and related services+5 more
  2. ATP GOV, LLC$40M−64% in FY2026
    ELK GROVE, IL · 38% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Computer systems design and related servicesNavy · Computer systems design and related servicesDefense Information Systems Agency · Computer systems design and related services+5 more
  3. OGIS COMMUNICATION GROUP INC$24.8M−36% in FY2026
    CINCINNATI, OH · 31% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Computer systems design and related servicesNavy · Computer systems design and related servicesDefense Information Systems Agency · Computer systems design and related services+8 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.