Federal contractor · ALEXANDRIA, VA

AMERICAN INDIAN HIGHER EDUCATION CONSORTIUM

AMERICAN INDIAN HIGHER EDUCATION CONSORTIUM received $61.2K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards. Since FY2017: $961.1K. Its largest customer was Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education ($61.2K). It also received $2.6M in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$61.2K
New awards
2
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
EGTJJJPLRT11
Other than small businessNative-ownedNonprofitEducational institution

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 458.7KFY2017
  2. 87.3KFY2018
  3. 53.5KFY2019
  4. 17.5KFY2020
  5. 54.7KFY2021
  6. 56.5KFY2022
  7. 82.3KFY2023
  8. 89.5KFY2024
  9. 61.2KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Education & social services$61.2K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $61.2K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $61.2K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Interior · 2 awards

Largest awards

  1. Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education· Douglas County, KS· Education & social services· Jan 22, 2026 – Jan 22, 2026· 140A2326P0030
  2. Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education· Bernalillo County, NM· Education & social services· Jan 12, 2026 – Jan 12, 2026· 140A2326P0029

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

AMERICAN INDIAN HIGHER EDUCATION CONSORTIUM received $2.6M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 14 actions (0 new awards), −55% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 43.008 · Office of Stem Engagement (OSTEM) ($2.1M).

Assistance · FY2026
$2.6M
New awards
0
Actions
14
Since FY2021
$53.2M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 22.3MFY2021
  2. 5.8MFY2022
  3. 12.8MFY2023
  4. 4MFY2024
  5. 5.7MFY2025
  6. 2.6MFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$2.6M100%

Top programs

  1. 43.008 · Office of Stem Engagement (OSTEM)$2.1M82%
  2. 93.859 · Biomedical Research and Research Training$452.7K18%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of Health and Human Services

Largest awards

  1. 47.070 · Computer and Information Science and Engineering· National Science Foundation· Project grant· Sep 12, 2023 – Apr 2, 2026· 2334701
  2. 93.837 · Cardiovascular Diseases Research· National Institutes of Health· Project grant· Sep 20, 2022 – Jun 24, 2026· S06GM142131
  3. 43.008 · Office of Stem Engagement (OSTEM)· National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Cooperative agreement· Dec 27, 2023 – Aug 12, 2026· 80NSSC24M0025
  4. 93.859 · Biomedical Research and Research Training· National Institutes of Health· Project grant· Aug 21, 2025 – Jul 20, 2026· R25GM160621

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $964.9K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $1.3M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $2.3M reported

  1. OAKLAND, CA · 1 subaward
  2. LINCOLN, NE · 1 subaward
  3. BOSTON, MA · 1 subaward

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SAN DIEGO, CA · 80% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education · Business, professional, labor, political, and similar organizations
  2. WASHINGTON, DC · 80% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education · Business, professional, labor, political, and similar organizations
  3. FLANDREAU, SD · 80% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education · Business, professional, labor, political, and similar organizations

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • American Indian Higher Education ConsortiumAI match · 100%
  • American Indian Higher Education Consortium (AIHEC)AI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$120K
9 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$420K
$420K in its own reports

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$120K
    8 reports
  2. 2024$120K
    8 reports
  3. 2025$120K
    9 reports
  4. 2026$60K
    4 reports

Top issues

  1. Budget and appropriations27 reports
  2. Education27 reports
  3. Agriculture24 reports
  4. Indian and Native American affairs3 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES27 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE27 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Bose Public Affairs Group$290K
    12 reports
  2. Powers Pyles Sutter & Verville, P.C.$90K
    3 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.