Federal contractor · GRAND RAPIDS, MI

AMPHENOL BORISCH TECHNOLOGIES, INC

No contract obligations recorded for AMPHENOL BORISCH TECHNOLOGIES, INC in FY2026. Since FY2017: $17.8M.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
TKV9LA1DAN27
Parent company
AIRMAR TECHNOLOGY CORP.
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

8 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $682.2K in FY2026 together.

  1. AMPHENOL BORISCH TECHNOLOGIES, INCGRAND RAPIDS, MI · Family page
    $0
  2. $670.3K
  3. $11.9K
  4. $0
  5. AMPHENOL PCD INCBEVERLY, MA
    $0
  6. $0
  7. $0
  8. $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2.6MFY2017
  2. 7.4MFY2018
  3. 3.8MFY2019
  4. 2.1MFY2020
  5. 223.9KFY2021
  6. 163.1KFY2022
  7. 130.5KFY2023
  8. 163.8KFY2024
  9. 1.2MFY2025

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for AMPHENOL BORISCH TECHNOLOGIES, INC in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $3.2M (14 subawards)

6 primes

  1. EL SEGUNDO, CA · 2 subawards
  2. TUCSON, AZ · 3 subawards
  3. STERLING HEIGHTS, MI · 5 subawards
  4. ANDOVER, MA · 2 subawards

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $6.6M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $7.7M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $5.7M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $9.9M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $6M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $3.2M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

37 companies · $275.6M reported

  1. FORT WORTH, TX · 433 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. GROTON, CT · 111 subawards · Other transportation equipment manufacturing
  3. TUCSON, AZ · 107 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 18 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ROCHESTER, NY · 29% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingAir Force · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  2. BURLINGTON, MA · 2 entities · 28% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  3. DEWESOFT LLC$3M−96% in FY2026
    WHITEHOUSE, OH · 28% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.