Federal contractor · NEWTON, UT

ANABRANCH SOLUTIONS, LLC

No contract obligations recorded for ANABRANCH SOLUTIONS, LLC in FY2026. Since FY2018: $1.5M. Its largest customer was Bureau of Land Management ($0).

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
1
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
H4J7JHNFLS46
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 66.6KFY2018
  2. 15KFY2020
  3. 342.2KFY2023
  4. 467.1KFY2024
  5. 563.1KFY2025
  6. 0FY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. Bureau of Land Management· Salt Lake County, UT· Facilities & utilities· Jan 16, 2025 – Sep 10, 2026· 140L5725P0010

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

ANABRANCH SOLUTIONS, LLC received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 2 actions (0 new awards), −100% vs FY2025.

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
2
Since FY2021
$788.7K

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 200KFY2021
  2. 184.5KFY2022
  3. 260KFY2023
  4. 121.1KFY2024
  5. 23.1KFY2025
  6. 0FY2026

Largest awards

  1. 15.657 · Endangered Species Recovery Implementation· U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service· Cooperative agreement· Aug 2, 2021 – Apr 9, 2026· F21AC03077
  2. 15.657 · Endangered Species Recovery Implementation· U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service· Cooperative agreement· Feb 5, 2024 – Dec 2, 2025· F24AC00563

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BUFFALO, WY · 85% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. RJRUDY LLC$554.5K+6.7% in FY2026
    BROOMFIELD, CO · 54% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. GRAND RIVER ARCHAEOLOGICAL INC$504.6K−59% in FY2026
    GRAND JUNCTION, CO · 49% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.