Federal contractor · BUFFALO, WY
GROUSE MOUNTAIN ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, LLC
GROUSE MOUNTAIN ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, LLC received $124.9K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (+16% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $2.6M. Its largest customer was Bureau of Land Management ($80.6K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $124.9K
- New awards
- 5
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 24%
- UEI
- ZKMQDBYUTL46
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 101.5KFY2017
- 300KFY2018
- 148.5KFY2019
- 284.1KFY2020
- 205KFY2021
- 180.1KFY2022
- 155.2KFY2023
- 975.5KFY2024
- 107.9KFY2025
- 124.9KFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Bureau of Land Management$80.6K65%4 awards
- National Park Service$44.3K35%1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Professional services$80.6K65%
- Facilities & utilities$44.3K35%
Where the work was performed
- Yellowstone County, MT$75.6K61%
- Moffat County, CO$44.3K35%
- Sublette County, WY$5,0004.0%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition24%US 39% · $30K
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions24%US 8.7% · $30K
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Bureau of Land Management· Yellowstone County, MT· Professional services· Mar 20, 2024 – Feb 10, 2026· 140L3624P0021
- Bureau of Land Management· Johnson County, WY· Professional services· Sep 24, 2024 – Jan 5, 2026· 140L1724P0084
- RIPARIAN PFC MONITORING$45.6KBureau of Land Management· Yellowstone County, MT· Professional services· Jun 4, 2026 – Jun 4, 2026· 140L3626F0023
- National Park Service· Moffat County, CO· Facilities & utilities· Jun 19, 2026 – Jun 19, 2026· 140PS126F0034
- Bureau of Land Management· Sublette County, WY· Professional services· Sep 5, 2025 – Jul 27, 2026· 140L6225P0036
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- ANABRANCH SOLUTIONS, LLC$1M−100% in FY2026NEWTON, UT · 73% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
- RJRUDY LLC$554.5K+6.7% in FY2026BROOMFIELD, CO · 46% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
- GRAND RIVER ARCHAEOLOGICAL INC$504.6K−59% in FY2026GRAND JUNCTION, CO · 42% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.