Federal contractor · KIHEI, HI

ANDERSON BURTON CONSTRUCTION INC

No contract obligations recorded for ANDERSON BURTON CONSTRUCTION INC in FY2026. Since FY2017: $7.1M.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
LPNEVNKZBMK9
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the ANDERSON BURTON CONSTRUCTION, INC. company family: 2 registered entities, $2.4M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. ANDERSON BURTON CONSTRUCTION, INC.ARROYO GRANDE, CA · Family page
    $2.4M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.1MFY2017
  2. 318.4KFY2018
  3. 5.7MFY2022
  4. 0FY2023
  5. -5.2KFY2024
  6. 906FY2025

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for ANDERSON BURTON CONSTRUCTION INC in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

1 company · $862.2K reported

  1. MWC GROUP, INC.$862.2K
    ADELANTO, CA · 1 subaward · Nonresidential building construction

Primes that pay it

No prime reported paying it.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. AMG JV$2.3M−100% in FY2026
    LEESBURG, VA · 88% of this company's obligations are in markets they both servePublic Buildings Service · Nonresidential building construction
  2. RGC CONSTRUCTORS INC$2.3M−95% in FY2026
    OMAHA, NE · 86% of this company's obligations are in markets they both servePublic Buildings Service · Nonresidential building constructionArmy · Nonresidential building construction
  3. GASTINGER AND WALKER ARCHITECTS, INC$2.3M−52% in FY2026
    KANSAS CITY, MO · 86% of this company's obligations are in markets they both servePublic Buildings Service · Nonresidential building construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.