Federal contractor · ARROYO GRANDE, CA
ANDERSON BURTON CONSTRUCTION, INC.
ANDERSON BURTON CONSTRUCTION, INC. received $2.4M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (+2,845% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $94.5M. Its largest customer was Public Buildings Service ($2.4M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $2.4M
- New awards
- 4
- Sole-source
- 1.1%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- CM6AAWP8H6Y4
Company family
Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.
2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $2.4M in FY2026 together.
- ANDERSON BURTON CONSTRUCTION, INC.ARROYO GRANDE, CA · Family page$2.4M
- ANDERSON BURTON CONSTRUCTION INCKIHEI, HI$0
AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 52.4MFY2017
- 12.9MFY2018
- 3.7MFY2019
- 6MFY2020
- 22.2KFY2021
- 192.6KFY2022
- 16.6MFY2023
- 191.8KFY2024
- 80.9KFY2025
- 2.4MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Public Buildings Service$2.4M99%1 awards
- U.S. Coast Guard$26K1.1%1 awards
- 1 awards
- Department of the Army$00.0%1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Construction & real property$2.4M99%
- Other equipment & supplies$26K1.1%
Where the work was performed
- Los Angeles County, CA$2.4M99%
- Maui County, HI$26K1.1%
- Kern County, CA$1,0000.0%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition1.1%US 39% · $27K
- Sole-source awards1.1%US 30% · $26K
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.7% · $1,000
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts
- U.S. Coast Guard$26KDepartment of Homeland Security · 1 awards
Largest awards
- Department of the Army· Kern County, CA· Construction & real property· Apr 14, 2023 – Dec 8, 2025· W9123823C0013
- Public Buildings Service· Los Angeles County, CA· Construction & real property· Sep 1, 2026 – Sep 29, 2026· 47PB5426F0017
- U.S. Coast Guard· Maui County, HI· Other equipment & supplies· Jun 8, 2026 – Jun 8, 2026· 70Z03426PHONO0161
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Kern County, CA· Construction & real property· Jun 24, 2026 – Jun 24, 2026· 80AFRC26FA050
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
1 company · $862.2K reported
- MWC GROUP, INC.$862.2KADELANTO, CA · 1 subaward · Nonresidential building construction
Primes that pay it
No prime reported paying it.
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- AMG JV$2.3M−100% in FY2026LEESBURG, VA · 88% of this company's obligations are in markets they both servePublic Buildings Service · Nonresidential building construction
- RGC CONSTRUCTORS INC$2.3M−95% in FY2026OMAHA, NE · 86% of this company's obligations are in markets they both servePublic Buildings Service · Nonresidential building constructionArmy · Nonresidential building construction
- GASTINGER AND WALKER ARCHITECTS, INC$2.3M−52% in FY2026KANSAS CITY, MO · 86% of this company's obligations are in markets they both servePublic Buildings Service · Nonresidential building construction
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.